On Saturday 29 October 2005 06:59 am, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 2005.10.29 00:01:42 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
| In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Rui Paulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| : On 2005.10.26 10:22:52 -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
| : | On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rui Paulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On 2005.10.26 10:22:52 -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
: | On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
: |
: | Main features:
: |
: | - Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
: |
: | In the
On 2005.10.29 00:01:42 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
| In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Rui Paulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| : On 2005.10.26 10:22:52 -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
| : | On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
| : |
| : | Main features:
|
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:53:35PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
- Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs.
[...persistence...]
FreeBSD 5+ has /etc/devfs.conf and /etc/devfs.rules [...]. Is that
what you're looking for?
I didn't write
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason Thorpe
writes:
FWIW, I think a devfs based on our new tmpfs would be better for NetBSD.
I was under the impression that each i-node in tmpfs consumed a fair
amount of space, making it a bad match for things like /dev which have
very many i-nodes but no
On Oct 26, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Bill Studenmund wrote:
In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs. One issue
that
has come up (I'll be honest, I've raised it a lot) is a desire to
retain
permission changes across boots, and to tie devices (when possible)
to a
device-specific
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Main features:
- Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs. One issue that
has come up (I'll be honest, I've raised it a lot) is a desire to retain
permission changes
On October 26, 2005 10:22 am, Bill Studenmund wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Main features:
- Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs. One issue
that has come up (I'll be honest, I've
Bill Studenmund wrote this message on Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:22 -0700:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Main features:
- Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs. One issue that
has come up
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:10, Bill Studenmund wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 09:29:52AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 05:48:06PM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
The reason I'm interested in locators is so that if devices renumber
themselves, the permissions
clutter.
Personally, I prefer the macros.
-- Lennart
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
I have made an effort on making a FreeBSD 5/6/7 kernel emulator for NetBSD
2.x. Many device drivers are shared between these two operating systems, and
I think a lot of work can be saved when it comes
Hi,
I have made an effort on making a FreeBSD 5/6/7 kernel emulator for NetBSD
2.x. Many device drivers are shared between these two operating systems, and
I think a lot of work can be saved when it comes to porting code and patches
forth and back. Currently this emulator makes my FreeBSD PCI
12 matches
Mail list logo
