Hi all,
I've very interested in scheduler implementation. I got some opinions on
FreeBSD5's scheduler from source codes and articles. And I presented here,
waiting for critism, for I'm new to FreeBSD.
KSE
1.an implementation of SA (Scheduler activation), two-level co-operating
scheduling
, also I used
rm -rf /usr/obj
cd /usr/src make cleandir
command before compiling. I don't know what to do, I really need to install
FreeBSD 5.x on this machine.
I even tried with FreeBSD 5.2RC2, but same results. Also I first tried to
compile kernel , but it is same, no results.
Can somebody help
strangely something like: addend changed to adddnd,
else changed to dlse, INFOPATH
changed to INFNPATH etc. I did cvsup several times, also I used
rm -rf /usr/obj
cd /usr/src make cleandir
command before compiling. I don't know what to do, I really need to install
FreeBSD 5.x on this machine.
I even
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net writes:
Hi,
I installed FreeBSD 5.1 in HP Vectra VE18 PIII 450MHz with 128MB RAM and
4GB HDD.
Without ECC or even parity memory?
However I'm having problem compiling sources. Whenever I try to make buildworl
d
make stops sometime later
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Ganbold wrote:
Hi,
I installed FreeBSD 5.1 in HP Vectra VE18 PIII 450MHz with 128MB RAM and
4GB HDD.
However I'm having problem compiling sources. Whenever I try to make buildworld
make stops sometime later saying some variable not found etc. When I check
As has
[ Bcc'd to -current following initial crosspost. Followups to -hackers
or directly to Mr. Penisoara. ]
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:17:15PM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Where can I find a (preferrably detailed) list of the new technologies
introduced with FreeBSD 5.x ?
Greetings Adrian
Hi,
I'm about to write an article on FreeBSD for PC Magazine Romania and I
would like to concentrate on the new technologies introduced in FreeBSD
5.x.
Where can I find a (preferrably detailed) list of the new technologies
introduced with FreeBSD 5.x ? I would also like, if possible, to
get
On 20-Jan-02 Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Alp Atici wrote:
Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0 (or
up)?
Is 5.x series going to be based on a preemptible kernel?
Can't
On 23 Jan, Terry Lambert wrote:
[gcc 3.0.x bug]
Actually, that was against 3.0 at -O2.
If that's been fixed, I guess we can cut over, as soom as the
non-x86 code generation for our other supported platforms
works again (tried compiling your RedHat for Alpha lately?).
gcc 3.0.3 has
Terry Lambert wrote:
Jason Andresen wrote:
Odd, I can't reproduce that under RedHat:
I guess you are saying there is a conspiracy to make GCC work
only on RedHat?
I could believe that... 8-) 8-) 8-).
Actually, that was against 3.0 at -O2.
If that's been fixed, I guess we can cut
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
[gcc 3.0.x bug]
Actually, that was against 3.0 at -O2.
If that's been fixed, I guess we can cut over, as soom as the
non-x86 code generation for our other supported platforms
works again (tried compiling your RedHat for Alpha lately?).
gcc 3.0.3 has
Terry Lambert wrote:
Alp Atici wrote:
Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
I think that the cut over will happen after the compiler
no longer core dumps on:
Odd, I can't
Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
Is 5.x series going to be based on a preemptible kernel?
Thanks,
Alp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Alp Atici wrote:
Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0 (or
up)?
Is 5.x series going to be based on a preemptible kernel?
Can't answer the gcc question, but yes, John
Alp Atici wrote:
Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
I think that the cut over will happen after the compiler
no longer core dumps on:
main()
{
int i;
15 matches
Mail list logo
