On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:37 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 10:29:49 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:50 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
This sounds like a superior approach. It doesn't break any current use
cases while
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:42:29 -0700, Garrett Cooper writes:
I'd like to know what all is
being contributed back from Juniper in terms of tests, ATF integration
into the build system (which I've given back to marcel@/gnn@, but
We aim to contribute build improvments, and integration of ATF was part
On Monday, October 01, 2012 6:31:00 pm Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
Hi Garrett,
From: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
Subject: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple =
programs instead of a singular program
Date: September 2, 2012 11:01:09 PM PDT
To:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:50 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
This sounds like a superior approach. It doesn't break any current use
cases while giving the ability to build multiple programs in the few
places that need it. It sounds like there are a few places under gnu/
from
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:50:23 -0400, John Baldwin writes:
BTW, one general comment. There seem to be two completely independent
groups of folks working on ATF (e.g. there have been two different
imports of ATF into the tree in two different locations IIRC, and now
we have two different sets of
On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 10:29:49 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:50 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
This sounds like a superior approach. It doesn't break any current use
cases while giving the ability to build multiple programs in the few
places
Hi Garrett,
From: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
Subject: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple =
programs instead of a singular program
Date: September 2, 2012 11:01:09 PM PDT
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-a...@freebsd.org Arch freebsd-a...@freebsd.org
=20
7 matches
Mail list logo
