On 2 Dec 2008, at 13:33 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Provided the module in question is contemplated for delivery
as a port, rather than as part of the base -- so that having a build
dependency on a port is tolerable -- perhaps it would be more easily
built using deve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Provided the module in question is contemplated for delivery
> as a port, rather than as part of the base -- so that having a build
> dependency on a port is tolerable -- perhaps it would be more easily
> built using devel/gmake?
You'd have to reproduce most of /usr/s
> As you discovered, includes are done before targets. You would
> need seperate invocations of make, to generate the file and get
> it included.
Provided the module in question is contemplated for delivery
as a port, rather than as part of the base -- so that having a build
dependency on a port
On Monday 01 December 2008 12:08:13 Nikola Knežević wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2008, at 01:22 , Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >> .MAKEFILEDEPS: elements.mk
> >> .sinclude "elements.mk"
> >> .include
> >> --->8---
> >> When I run make depend, it only includes SRCSs from BSDmakefile,
> >> not those from elements.mk
On 1 Dec 2008, at 01:22 , Tim Kientzle wrote:
.MAKEFILEDEPS: elements.mk
.sinclude "elements.mk"
.include
--->8---
When I run make depend, it only includes SRCSs from BSDmakefile,
not those from elements.mk.
I would try adding a "beforedepend" requirement:
beforedepend: elements.mk
Look
Nikola Knežević wrote:
As I described in my initial mail, I have to use two makefiles. One is
the main Makefile, while the other has to be generated. In the
generated .mk, I add to the SRCS, and I create the .PATH target with
other (necessary) directories. Unfortunately, make depend doesn't
On 30 Nov 2008, at 18:43 , Mel wrote:
since there were no replies, I went into the various .mk's, and I
found some inconsistencies when building modules. If you have a file
in a different directory, below the directory where you BSDmakefile
is, objects won't be linked nor cleaned properly.
The
On Saturday 29 November 2008 12:40:47 Nikola Knežević wrote:
> On 25 Nov 2008, at 15:20 , Nikola Knežević wrote:
> > I tried to move from OBJS into SRCS (main BSDmakefile now has: SRCS+=
> > $(ELEMENT_SRCS)), by using something like:
> > # subdir0
> > ELEMENT_SRCS__x =\
> > subdir1/file0.cc \
> > s
On 25 Nov 2008, at 15:20 , Nikola Knežević wrote:
I tried to move from OBJS into SRCS (main BSDmakefile now has: SRCS+=
$(ELEMENT_SRCS)), by using something like:
# subdir0
ELEMENT_SRCS__x =\
subdir1/file0.cc \
subdir1/file1.cc
...
But this fails during the linking phase, because the linker is
Hi,
I'm playing with the Click Modular router on my FreeBSD box. Out of
curiosity, I decided to switch its GNU makefile to BSD style. I
managed to do it, but I would like to polish it a bit more (and learn
some things along).
Old GNUmakefile relies heavily on OBJS and *_OBJS, as it fills
10 matches
Mail list logo
