RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-18 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Louis A. Mamakos Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:31 PM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: void; Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards I am

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-17 Thread Louis A. Mamakos
We have been told by our rep at Time Warner Communications that those payments are still continuing. TW (at least in PDX) does not have enough voice sales to be able to get on that pig trough and is equally unhappy as we are that the RBOC's are propping up what are in effect bankrupt

RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-17 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Louis A. Mamakos Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:43 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: void; Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards We have

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-17 Thread Louis A. Mamakos
I am perfectly aware of this. The RBOCs deserved to have those fines levied against them for a number of years, to punish them for attempting to block the CLECs. However, it's been long enough for this, and in fact the money from the RBOCs is no longer being used to increase the CLEC's

RE: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-16 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: void [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 9:22 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 10:09:44PM -0700, Ted

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Bsdguru
In a message dated 10/13/2001 1:24:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You tell your supplier that since the 405 is being phased out that he should sell you a bunch of them at closeout prices. Perhaps the fact that the (incredibly slow) 2501 has been phased

RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards You know I really think your baiting me. You know perfectly well

RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: Matt Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 10:40 PM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards The Cisco 2600 series is great for T1's. A 2620 with a T1

Re: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Matt Dillon
:on the Internet has been routers costing in the $100,000 range. Now, maybe :BEST Internet is now wealthy enough that you can blow that kind of money on :Cisco gear without thinking about it, but a lot of smaller ISP's are not. : :If you look at what happened last weekend on Sunday, and the

RE: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: Matt Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 6:33 PM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards :on the Internet has been routers costing in the $100,000

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-12 Thread Bsdguru
In a message dated 10/12/01 1:08:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Consider that the Hitachi controller chip used on the WANic 405 is the SAME chip that Cisco uses in it's 25xx series of routers, and the Cisco 2501 is the most used router in the world and has the most

RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-12 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 6:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards In a message dated 10/12/01 1:08:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-12 Thread Matt Dillon
The Cisco 2600 series is great for T1's. A 2620 with a T1 card (it can take up to two) and you are done. The 2501's are ancient, don't even bother any more. You can find 2620's on EBay in the $700-$1500 range, many of which appear (in my quick look) to include a T1 card.

Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-11 Thread MurrayTaylor
As the WanIC-405 is being phased out (according to my supplier down under here in OZ), has any development / testing been done on the apparent replacement, the WanIC-521 (522, 524 ... ) range I am especially interested in its compatibility with its predecessor which I am using very successfully

RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-11 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Of MurrayTaylor Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards As the WanIC-405 is being phased out (according to my supplier down under here in OZ), has any development / testing been done on the apparent replacement, the WanIC