According to Bill Pechter:
> Is this as much of a surprise to all of you as to me... I thought jfs
> would remain a tightly held OSF/1 component that would never see
> "free" status.
Note that the released version is the OS/2 one (maybe based on HPFS?) not the
one in AIX.
But I agree this is goo
[moved to -fs]
On Friday, 4 February 2000 at 15:28:34 -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> Bill Pechter wrote:
>>
>> Folks, while some of us were at Linux expo talking about journaling file
>> systems and *BSD, IBM released jfs to the GPL.
>>
>> Is there anyone working on this as a gpl'd add-in to *BSD?
>
Bill Pechter wrote:
>
> Folks, while some of us were at Linux expo talking about journaling file
> systems and *BSD, IBM released jfs to the GPL.
>
> Is there anyone working on this as a gpl'd add-in to *BSD?
You apparently haven't noticed the war of words going on on
http://daily.daemonnews.o
At 2:57 PM -0500 2/4/00, Bill Pechter wrote:
>Folks, while some of us were at Linux expo talking about journaling
>file systems and *BSD, IBM released jfs to the GPL.
>
>Is there anyone working on this as a gpl'd add-in to *BSD?
People outside the expo heard about it too, and there has been an
ac
Folks, while some of us were at Linux expo talking about journaling file
systems and *BSD, IBM released jfs to the GPL.
Is there anyone working on this as a gpl'd add-in to *BSD?
Is this as much of a surprise to all of you as to me... I thought jfs
would remain a tightly held OSF/1 component th
5 matches
Mail list logo
