Why on earth would you want this?
Hi. Since your quote of my note was not to the original,
I'll repost it here. Kurt Lidl also posted useful situations
on these lists. Also, being able to have time tick backwards
in jails could be interesting fuzzing too :-) Enjoy.
Would be nice to be able to
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 11:19:23PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
Why on earth would you want this?
Oh, it's not hard to imagine why you want to do this. Say
you're testing a particular date rollover event, and want
to make sure your software is up to snuff. Doing it in a
jail would make it easy to
Why on earth would you want this?
Warner
On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:31 AM, grarpamp wrote:
possibly achievable in libc?
I don't know. Where else would it be done?
stat, utimes, gettimeofday, clock_gettime,
adjtime, etc and their variations.
I've not checked what currently happens, but I
possibly achievable in libc?
I don't know. Where else would it be done?
stat, utimes, gettimeofday, clock_gettime,
adjtime, etc and their variations.
I've not checked what currently happens, but I
don't think root in a jail should be able to set
any kernel time parameters, absent a syscall
that
Would be nice to be able to set different times in different jails.
All jails would tick in step with the system.
But each jail could have it's birthtime set specifically via jail(8),
jail(2), etc. Either by specification of a specific time, or an offset
from the current true system time. ie:
On 7/3/11 1:16 AM, grarpamp wrote:
Would be nice to be able to set different times in different jails.
All jails would tick in step with the system.
But each jail could have it's birthtime set specifically via jail(8),
jail(2), etc. Either by specification of a specific time, or an offset
from
6 matches
Mail list logo
