Tue, May 15, 2001 at 16:39:29, fmela0 (Farooq Mela) wrote about "Re: Kqueue and
FreeBSD versions":
> > It was introduced with 4.1; I believe the correct __FreeBSD_version
> > to use is 41000.
s/41000/41/ - fix typo at least.
> Great, thanks. I figured you'
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> It was introduced with 4.1; I believe the correct __FreeBSD_version
> to use is 41000.
> --
> Jonathan
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Great, thanks. I figured you'd be the authority on thi
Will Andrews wrote:
> was introduced a loong time ago, and it was subsequently
> obsoleted two years ago in favor of .
>
> The CVS logs will indicate which __FreeBSD_version you need for
> kqueue(). I imagine the number is around 45.
Thanks. Maybe the documentation for FreeBSD_version in
/
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Hi -hackers,
>
>Just a quick question.
>What value of __FreeBSD_version should I require for kqueue? (I mean
>) - was it introduced in 4.1 or 4.2 (memory fails me)?
It was introduced with 4.1; I believe the correct __FreeBSD_version
to use is 41000.
--
Jo
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:16:23PM -0700, Farooq Mela wrote:
> Hi -hackers,
>
> Just a quick question.
> What value of __FreeBSD_version should I require for kqueue? (I mean
> ) - was it introduced in 4.1 or 4.2 (memory fails me)?
was introduced a loong time ago, and it was subsequently
obsolet
Hi -hackers,
Just a quick question.
What value of __FreeBSD_version should I require for kqueue? (I mean
) - was it introduced in 4.1 or 4.2 (memory fails me)?
TIA,
--
farooq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of th
6 matches
Mail list logo
