On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 01:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:51:31AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote:
> +> Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll
> +> patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK
> +> or somebody
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:51:31AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote:
+> Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll
+> patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK
+> or somebody else @freebsd will respond with any plans to roll this
+> functionalit
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:10 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin Hopper wrote:
> Correct. 5.x does not have this feature; Aaron, please read for yourself
> before you are rude towards others.
Turn's out *I* missed something. I'd have sworn up and down 5.3's jail
implementat
Justin Hopper wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll
patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK
or somebody else @freebsd will respond with any plans to roll this
functionality into the base system. It's really not a prob
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:51 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> Justin Hopper wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Two questions:
> >>>
> >>>1) Is there any formal plans to in
Chris Howells wrote:
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 08:23, Justin Hopper wrote:
1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails
binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon?
'ifconfig alias'
Please, people, read his question. Into JAILS. When you attempt to add
a
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 08:23, Justin Hopper wrote:
> 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails
> binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon?
'ifconfig alias'
--
Cheers, Chris Howells -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://chrishowell
Justin Hopper wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Two questions:
1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails
binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon?
Som
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Two questions:
> >
> > 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails
> > binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon?
>
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails
> binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon?
Someone hasn't read up on 5.x...
> 2) Has anyone used Pawel's multi
Two questions:
1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails
binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon?
2) Has anyone used Pawel's multiple IP patch in a semi-production
environment? Can anyone report any problems or issues that they've had
with it?
Thank
Hello,
Multiple IP functionality is part of the jail separation patch I made
earlier this year for 5.0 while playing with using jails as a VPS
solution. It includes other stuff besides multiple IP addresses; I
basically used the mijail 4.x patch as a reference, changing code to
refer to struct thr
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 20:42, Mooneer Salem wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 23:39, Mike K wrote:
> > Anyone successfully get this to work in a working environment, not
> > just install?
>
> I'm thinking that this would be a better solution for a virtual
> hosting environment (once st
Hello,
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 23:39, Mike K wrote:
> Anyone successfully get this to work in a working environment, not just
> install?
I'm thinking that this would be a better solution for a virtual hosting
environment (once stabilized): http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/. In
any case, I've go
Anyone successfully get this to work in a working environment, not just
install?
I'm wondering if I'm beating a dead horse by my continued [unsuccessful]
efforts to get this to work.
-Mike
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Vers
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:01:23AM -0800, FB wrote:
+> Before the patch was applied, the jail environment had no problem with dns.
+> After the patch was applied however (and userland rebuilt both on host and
+> jail), dns breaks in the jail environment. Basically, gethostbyname fails
+> and h_er
> Outside the jail, it worked fine. inside the jail, sendto failed with a
> EINVAL error.
See:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/26506
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubs
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:01:23AM -0800, FB wrote:
+> We patched mijail5 (http://garage.freebsd.pl/mijail.README) against
+> RELENG_5_1. Most of the patch was successful with a little fuzz, except for
+> a couple lines in jls which didn't patch due to cosmetic changes (easily
+> fixed).
+>
Hey all -
We patched mijail5 (http://garage.freebsd.pl/mijail.README) against
RELENG_5_1. Most of the patch was successful with a little fuzz, except for
a couple lines in jls which didn't patch due to cosmetic changes (easily
fixed).
Before the patch was applied, the jail environment
19 matches
Mail list logo
