Re: Number of TUN devices

1999-05-21 Thread Mark Tinguely
(discussion moved from -questions to -hackers; bits included) On Thursday, 20 May 1999 at 9:13:12 -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: FYI: I am playing with the idea of a direct-insert PPP for future SONET/ATM/DSL PPP connections. here compression/ACCM are not a concern but higher data

Re: Number of TUN devices

1999-05-21 Thread Brian Somers
[.] Why are you thinking of using user PPP for this? As you say, at the data rates you're thinking of, it's not an optimal solution. no, only the LCP, NCP, authenication, dignostic messages for debugging is done in user space. this is small traffic to setup/maintain/tear down the

Re: Number of TUN devices

1999-05-21 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 21 May 1999, Mark Tinguely wrote: (discussion moved from -questions to -hackers; bits included) On Thursday, 20 May 1999 at 9:13:12 -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: FYI: I am playing with the idea of a direct-insert PPP for future SONET/ATM/DSL PPP connections. here