(discussion moved from -questions to -hackers; bits included)
On Thursday, 20 May 1999 at 9:13:12 -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
FYI:
I am playing with the idea of a direct-insert PPP for future SONET/ATM/DSL
PPP connections. here compression/ACCM are not a concern but higher data
[.]
Why are you thinking of using user PPP for this? As you say, at the
data rates you're thinking of, it's not an optimal solution.
no, only the LCP, NCP, authenication, dignostic messages for debugging
is done in user space. this is small traffic to setup/maintain/tear down
the
On Fri, 21 May 1999, Mark Tinguely wrote:
(discussion moved from -questions to -hackers; bits included)
On Thursday, 20 May 1999 at 9:13:12 -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
FYI:
I am playing with the idea of a direct-insert PPP for future
SONET/ATM/DSL
PPP connections. here
3 matches
Mail list logo