On 2/28/07, Sten Daniel Soersdal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:25:11PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:31:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the goals of the
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:12:52PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I've mentioned this a couple of times, but postgresql didn't scale
well [on freebsd at least] when I tried it last year. I hope to
revisit when I get time.
Let
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:25:11PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:31:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:31:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for performance
bottlenecks to be optimized.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:25:11PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:31:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:25:11PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:31:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have
On 2007-Feb-24 16:31:11 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have recently made significant progress on optimizing for MySQL
running on an 8-core amd64 system. The graph of results may be found
here:
http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/scaling.png
Those results look wonderful.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:08:37PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Feb-24 16:31:11 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have recently made significant progress on optimizing for MySQL
running on an 8-core amd64 system. The graph of results may be found
here:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:15:27PM +0100, Divacky Roman wrote:
I wonder if anyone measured what effect superpages has on mysql performance...
this should not help scaling but I can imagine it has some effect.
I have thought about trying this but have not found the time. I am
currently very
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:31:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for performance
bottlenecks to be optimized.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree
with 4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP scheduler
for scalability. It would be nice to see
On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT
tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP
scheduler for
scalability. It would be
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Martin Blapp wrote:
It would be really great if we could find workload owners who would
maintain easy-to-run benchmark configurations and also run them regularly
on a fixed hardware configuration over a long time publishing results and
testing patches. Kris has done this
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:54:20PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
It would be really great if we could find workload owners who would
maintain easy-to-run benchmark configurations and also run them regularly
on a fixed hardware configuration over a long time publishing results and
Hi,
It would be really great if we could find workload owners who would
maintain easy-to-run benchmark configurations and also run them regularly on
a fixed hardware configuration over a long time publishing results and
testing patches. Kris has done this for SQL benchmarks to great effect,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:27:01AM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
If you can package up some kind of test or analogous workload that I
can run, I'd be happy to take a look at profiling it on MP hardware.
Should be possible. Btw. Has setting kern.threads.virtual_cpu to a different
Hi,
If you can package up some kind of test or analogous workload that I
can run, I'd be happy to take a look at profiling it on MP hardware.
Should be possible. Btw. Has setting kern.threads.virtual_cpu to a different
value effect for running programms or just started ones ?
P.S. I
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for performance
bottlenecks to be optimized.
We have recently made significant progress on optimizing for
On Saturday 24 February 2007 1:31 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling
FreeBSD in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for
performance bottlenecks to be optimized.
On 2/24/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for performance
bottlenecks to be optimized.
We have
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP scheduler for
scalability. It would be nice to see the comparison displayed to see what
the
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:47:55AM +, Coleman Kane wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it was
proclaimed:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:05:53AM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT
tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it was
proclaimed:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP
On 2/24/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:47:55AM +, Coleman Kane wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it
was proclaimed:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance
25 matches
Mail list logo
