On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, ghos wrote:
You wrote 29 mar 2004, 8:05:55 +0500:
Hi,
I traced sshd using ktrace and it says:
..
10198 new CALL setuid(0)
10198 new RET setuid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
10198 new CALL
You wrote 29 mar 2004, 8:05:55 +0500:
Hi,
I traced sshd using ktrace and it says:
..
10198 new CALL setuid(0)
10198 new RET setuid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
10198 new CALL execve(0x80485d0,0xbfbfed8c,0xbfbfed94)
10198 new NAMI
Hi,
I traced sshd using ktrace and it says:
..
10198 new CALL setuid(0)
10198 new RET setuid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
10198 new CALL execve(0x80485d0,0xbfbfed8c,0xbfbfed94)
10198 new NAMI /home/new/new.pl
10198 new RET execve -1 errno 13
Please don't crosspost.
I don't think this is a topic for -current, so I've removed it.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:05:55AM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
10198 new CALL setuid(0)
10198 new RET setuid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
Your attempt to setuid(0) failed.
10198 new
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Ganbold wrote:
Hi,
I traced sshd using ktrace and it says:
..
10198 new CALL setuid(0)
10198 new RET setuid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
10198 new CALL execve(0x80485d0,0xbfbfed8c,0xbfbfed94)
10198 new NAMI /home/new/new.pl
In the last episode (Mar 28), Sean Kelly said:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:05:55AM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
10198 new CALL setuid(0)
10198 new RET setuid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
Your attempt to setuid(0) failed.
10198 new CALL
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT and I'm trying to write a small C program
which in turn calls perl script.
Perl script creates user account. I created user called new and put new.c
and new.pl into its directory.
Then I changed shell for user new to point to /home/new/new.
The idea is I want
Hi,
I tested my perl script, C program in FreeBSD 4.9, all work just fine.
I checked OpenSSH version and:
FreeBSD 4.9 - OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030924
FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT - OpenSSH_3.8p1 FreeBSD-20040226
Is this difference causing the problem?
Should I change something
8 matches
Mail list logo