Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev wrote:
Hello, hackers
I'm writing some program, which dlopens() a lot of shared objects, and
can do nasty things to it's own memory. Some day I decided to trap fatal
memory signals, like SIGILL, SIGBUS and SIGSEGV, and wrote a handler for
these, which swears with bad
Look for abort() or SIGABRT.
On 21 Aug 2003 21:57:41 +
Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, hackers
I'm writing some program, which dlopens() a lot of shared objects, and
can do nasty things to it's own memory. Some day I decided to trap
fatal memory signals, like
At Thu, 21.08.2003, 22:05, Lev Walkin wrote:
Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev wrote:
Hello, hackers
I'm writing some program, which dlopens() a lot of shared objects, and
can do nasty things to it's own memory. Some day I decided to trap fatal
memory signals, like SIGILL, SIGBUS and SIGSEGV,
At Thu, 21.08.2003, 22:02, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
Look for abort() or SIGABRT.
Thanks so far for you and Lev.. Is there the way to specify struct
sigcontext to it? I still wish to have `correct' registers values to be
written into coredump, those that were when signal happened, and not
that were
Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev wrote:
At Thu, 21.08.2003, 22:05, Lev Walkin wrote:
Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev wrote:
Hello, hackers
I'm writing some program, which dlopens() a lot of shared objects, and
can do nasty things to it's own memory. Some day I decided to trap fatal
memory signals, like
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:12:49PM + or thereabouts, Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev
wrote:
At Thu, 21.08.2003, 22:02, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
Look for abort() or SIGABRT.
Thanks so far for you and Lev.. Is there the way to specify struct
sigcontext to it? I still wish to have `correct'
6 matches
Mail list logo