| On the other hand, there are numerous new features (GEOM, TrustedBSD,
| OpenPAM, Snapshots + background fsck, etc) being implemented in 5.x that
It appears that most of these are features that are 'use as needed.' In
other words, if I don't need them, I don't need to know about them. On
the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], j mckitrick writes:
| On the other hand, there are numerous new features (GEOM, TrustedBSD,
| OpenPAM, Snapshots + background fsck, etc) being implemented in 5.x that
Other than devfs (which I haven't investigated yet) it seems most of
these features are extras,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:44:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], j mckitrick writes:
| | On the other hand, there are numerous new features (GEOM, TrustedBSD,
| | OpenPAM, Snapshots + background fsck, etc) being implemented in 5.x that
|
|
| Other than devfs
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], j mckitrick writes:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:44:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], j mckitrick writes:
| | On the other hand, there are numerous new features (GEOM, TrustedBSD,
| | OpenPAM, Snapshots + background fsck, etc) being
On 06-Jun-2002 j mckitrick wrote:
Hi all,
I'm sure the SMP features along with removal of the Big Giant Lock (TM)
are designed to sacrifice as little performance as possible across the
board. In practical terms, will a 5.0 kernel without SMP have any
performance loss at all on a single
| almost all of the kernel. However, the SMP work is still in progress and
| it will get better as time goes on. One thing to note is that in 4.x,
Well, I'm trying to decide if I should make the leap to 5.0 when it
comes out (my early adopter side talking) or wait around for a rev or 2
(my
On 07-Jun-2002 j mckitrick wrote:
| almost all of the kernel. However, the SMP work is still in progress and
| it will get better as time goes on. One thing to note is that in 4.x,
Well, I'm trying to decide if I should make the leap to 5.0 when it
comes out (my early adopter side talking)
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, j mckitrick wrote:
| almost all of the kernel. However, the SMP work is still in progress and
| it will get better as time goes on. One thing to note is that in 4.x,
Well, I'm trying to decide if I should make the leap to 5.0 when it
comes out (my early adopter side
| If none of the features are that useful to you, then by all means stick
| with 4.7 or whatever we're up to when 5.0-release comes out. I'm sure
Well, I definitely plan to move to 5.x. The question is when. When it
will be ready for general use, and when I will be able to learn all the
new
:| If none of the features are that useful to you, then by all means stick
:| with 4.7 or whatever we're up to when 5.0-release comes out. I'm sure
:
:Well, I definitely plan to move to 5.x. The question is when. When it
:will be ready for general use, and when I will be able to learn all the
10 matches
Mail list logo
