Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 12/11/2007, Randall Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At this point I'm not sure why FreeBSD's API call is so slow (btw, it's not the system call that's responsible, if I make several additional API calls on each read, e.g., doing lseeks, this has only a marginal impact on performance). But

Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-12 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:52:21AM -0800, Randall Hyde wrote: why C's code was so much faster, I dug into the source code and discovered that open/read/write/etc. use *buffered* I/O (which explains why dd performs so well). open/read/write/etc. do _not_ do any buffering in userland. This is

Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-12 Thread Benjamin Lutz
Randall Hyde wrote: Hi All, I recently ported my HLA (High Level Assembler) compiler to FreeBSD and, along with it, the HLA Standard Library. I have a performance-related question concerning file I/O. It appears that character-at-a-time file I/O is *exceptionally* slow. Yes, I realize

Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-12 Thread Randall Hyde
Hello Randy, First, let me out myself as a fan of yours. It was your book that got me started on ASM and taught me a lot about computers and logic, plus it provided some entertainment and mental sustenance in pretty boring times, so thanks! Now, as for your problem: I think I have to

Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-11 Thread Randall Hyde
Hi All, Well, I've done some sleuthing and discovered some issues. First, the dd command produced approximately the same results everyone else was getting. So I rewrote a version of my test code in C using the stdlib read call and it had really great performance. Not understanding why C's code

Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 08:36:32AM -0800, Randall Hyde wrote: To answer a different question in the thread, I'm pretty sure I'm making only one FreeBSD call per byte, at least in one of the cases I posted. How about using ktrace or similar to confirm this. I wonder if I'm only getting one

Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-09 Thread Dinesh Nair
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:52:38 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Nov 08), Randall Hyde said: It appears that character-at-a-time file I/O is *exceptionally* slow. Yes, I realize that when processing large files I really ought to be doing block/buffered I/O to get the best

Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-09 Thread Randall Hyde
You should also carefully do an strace or similar on Windows and Linux as well. You may find that you're doing a system call per byte on FreeBSD but not on those other systems. Certainly this might be possible under Windows, as I have no idea what happens once I link in one of the various

Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-08 Thread Randall Hyde
Hi All, I recently ported my HLA (High Level Assembler) compiler to FreeBSD and, along with it, the HLA Standard Library. I have a performance-related question concerning file I/O. It appears that character-at-a-time file I/O is *exceptionally* slow. Yes, I realize that when processing large

Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 08), Randall Hyde said: It appears that character-at-a-time file I/O is *exceptionally* slow. Yes, I realize that when processing large files I really ought to be doing block/buffered I/O to get the best performance, but for certain library routines I've written it's

Re: Some FreeBSD performance Issues

2007-11-08 Thread Tim Kientzle
Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Nov 08), Randall Hyde said: It appears that character-at-a-time file I/O is *exceptionally* slow. ... reasonable, though not stellar, performance under Windows and Linux. However, with the port to FreeBSD I'm seeing a three-orders-of-magnitude