On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:57:07 +0300
Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy.
1.Is it true that kernel threads are more heavy than userspace
ones (pthread) and hence application with hundreds of threads will
work evidently slower than that using pthreads due to more switching
penalties?
Alex wrote:
I was so much enthusiastic about kernel threads implemented in 5.x but
some ugly rumors spoiled my dreams :0)
So I want to get if these rumors are myths or not.
5.x does not implement traditional kernel threads like you appear
to be thinking about them. Instead, it implements a
Miguel Mendez wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:57:07 +0300
Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy.
1.Is it true that kernel threads are more heavy than userspace
ones (pthread) and hence application with hundreds of threads will
work evidently slower than that using pthreads due to more switching
Hi everybody!
I was so much enthusiastic about kernel threads implemented in 5.x but
some ugly rumors spoiled my dreams :0)
So I want to get if these rumors are myths or not.
1.Is it true that kernel threads are more heavy than userspace
ones (pthread) and hence application with hundreds
4 matches
Mail list logo