Re: Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-05 Thread Terry Lambert
Steve Roome wrote: Can these newer drives, based on the IC-35L0?0-chipset, also be used with TCQ enabled in FBSD? (? is 2, 4 or 6 depending on whether the drive has 20, 40 or 60 GB capacity). I've got one of these : ad0: 39266MB IC35L040AVER07-0 [79780/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66

Re: Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-05 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Steve Roome wrote: On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 07:20:30PM +0200, Niek Bergboer wrote: Can these newer drives, based on the IC-35L0?0-chipset, also be used with TCQ enabled in FBSD? (? is 2, 4 or 6 depending on whether the drive has 20, 40 or 60 GB capacity). Yes, and support has been

Re: Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-05 Thread Thierry Herbelot
Hello, sos Søren Schmidt wrote: [SNIP] Anyhow, the problem at hand is more like bad chipsets, there is ALOT of ATA chipsets thats not working right when used the way needed for tagged queuing. That said, the IBM DTLA's series of drives are extremely is there some place where a recommended

Re: Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:33:55PM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote: known-bad revision for these babies -, and the 762 North Bridge of the soon to be there SMP Athlon) Soon to be there?? Hum... I'm typing to you from one. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-05 Thread Thierry Herbelot
David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:33:55PM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote: known-bad revision for these babies -, and the 762 North Bridge of the soon to be there SMP Athlon) Soon to be there?? Hum... I'm typing to you from one. Excuse me : I meant for the common mortal,

Re: Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 06:40:01AM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:33:55PM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote: known-bad revision for these babies -, and the 762 North Bridge of the soon to be there SMP Athlon) Soon to be there?? Hum... I'm typing to you from

Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Niek Bergboer
Hi, I posted this message on -questions, and since I got no reply I've assumed that it's technical enough to post here on -hackers. Since FBSD 4.3-RELEASE, tagged command queuing is supported for IBM DTLA and DPTA IDE drives. However, the newer Deskstar GXP drives also support TCQ according to

Re: Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Jason Andresen
Niek Bergboer wrote: Hi, I posted this message on -questions, and since I got no reply I've assumed that it's technical enough to post here on -hackers. Since FBSD 4.3-RELEASE, tagged command queuing is supported for IBM DTLA and DPTA IDE drives. However, the newer Deskstar GXP drives

Re: Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Steve Roome
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 07:20:30PM +0200, Niek Bergboer wrote: Can these newer drives, based on the IC-35L0?0-chipset, also be used with TCQ enabled in FBSD? (? is 2, 4 or 6 depending on whether the drive has 20, 40 or 60 GB capacity). I've got one of these : ad0: 39266MB IC35L040AVER07-0