To: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[off-list]
Ugh. My apologies to everyone involved.
I'll go crawl back in my hole now
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ /
der Mouse wrote:
[off-list]
Uh, no it wasn't. Do you want a reply? On list or off?
8-).
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:00:48PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
snip
This is actually incorrect. At one point in time, the email
address of the driver authors was printed out in boot messsages,
under Linux. They had a flag day in which Linus removed all
the printf's. This flag day was
Sean Davis wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:00:48PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
snip
This is actually incorrect. At one point in time, the email
address of the driver authors was printed out in boot messsages,
under Linux. They had a flag day in which Linus removed all
the printf's.
4. Any chance of merging the very best part of each kernel?
5. Or is it possible to do so?
No, I don't forsee merging. der Mouse pointed out the GPL issue, which is
one where I think the BSD and Linux folks will just agree to disagree.
Besides some big issues of ideology, there is
[...the whole thread re BSD vs Linux...]
[...] Eventually, the die-hards will die hard, and the lack of new
competent BSD hackers will seal the coffin...the BSD sysadmin will be
sent packing
I've seen it said that ego will be the death of BSD.
The more I see of BSD the more I believe it.
der Mouse wrote:
In most respects I don't care much for the GPL, but this is one of the
really good effects it has: it keeps people from using you gotta
splash my name all over everything licenses on their stuff. I just
looked at the INSTALL.txt file from the most recent NetBSD/sparc
release
[off-list]
If Copyright law were to acknowledge the existance of Public Domain,
by providing liability protection for authors whose code was used by
third parties, resulting in damages, then almost every BSD developer
I'm aware of wuld release their code as public domain, instead.
How does
On 2003-01-24 22:56, Mike Bristow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ Reply-To set to me: This is probably off topic for all of the lists:
all of the ones I read, anyway. ]
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 10:03:53AM -0800, Bill Studenmund wrote:
2. How does it differ? What are the technical reasoning
Josef El-Rayes wrote:
Dear Arief,
as you can see your questions are not very welcome on the mailinglists, therefore i
advice you to have a look at this book if you are interested in BSD's technical
background
Title: The Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operating System
Authors:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Steve Kudlak wrote:
If one really wanted to have fun, and I have
thought of this. A triple boot system would
be the real way to find out the differences and
compare the *BSD, Linux and the Windows
Universes.
What a unique idea.
Paul Halliday wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Steve Kudlak wrote:
If one really wanted to have fun, and I have
thought of this. A triple boot system would
be the real way to find out the differences and
compare the *BSD, Linux and the Windows
Universes.
What a unique idea.
Dear Arief,
as you can see your questions are not very welcome on the mailinglists, therefore i
advice you to have a look at this book if you are interested in BSD's technical
background
Title: The Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operating System
Authors: McKusick, Bostic, Karels and
[follow-ups to [EMAIL PROTECTED], please]
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
as you can see your questions are not very welcome on the mailinglists,
therefore i advice you to have a look at this book if you are interested
in BSD's technical background
There is one mailing list where
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, arief_mulya wrote:
Dear all,
I Apologize, If this thread has existed before, and so if
this is very offtopic and tiredsome for most of you here.
I'm a newbie, and just about to get my feet wet into the
kernel-code, been using (GNU/)Linux (or whatever the name
is, I
[dropped linux-kernel]
Bill Studenmund wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, arief_mulya wrote:
4. Any chance of merging the very best part of each kernel?
5. Or is it possible to do so?
No, I don't forsee merging. der Mouse pointed out the GPL issue, which is
one where I think the BSD and Linux
Steve Kudlak wrote:
Like speaking of technical things has anyone brought
up a raytrace/rendering or other fancy computer graphics
system under FreeBSD?
Yes.
Manex Visual Effects did.
Perhaps you've heard of the movie The Matrix, whose computer
graphics were rendered on FreeBSD systems?
--
[ Reply-To set to me: This is probably off topic for all of the lists:
all of the ones I read, anyway. ]
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 10:03:53AM -0800, Bill Studenmund wrote:
2. How does it differ? What are the technical reasoning
behind the decisions?
They differ in most technical areas.
Dear all,
I Apologize, If this thread has existed before, and so if
this is very offtopic and tiredsome for most of you here.
I'm a newbie, and just about to get my feet wet into the
kernel-code, been using (GNU/)Linux (or whatever the name
is, I personally don't really care, I caremost at the
Dear Arief,
I Apologize, If this thread has existed before, and so if
this is very offtopic and tiredsome for most of you here.
I'm a newbie, and just about to get my feet wet into the
world, been living in (ASIA/)Indonesia (or whatever the name
is, I personally don't really care, I caremost at
arief_mulya wrote:
| I Apologize, If this thread has existed before, and so if
| this is very offtopic and tiredsome for most of you here.
Have you considered Windows?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
21 matches
Mail list logo
