Hi,
At 11:35 24/04/01 +0200, Niek Bergboer wrote:
[...]
In fact, I couldn't care less if the allocated blocks contain random
data (rather than zeros), since I'll be overwriting them immediately.
You *should* care: the blocks are zeroed for security reasons.
--
Bob Bishop +44
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Niek Bergboer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:09:26PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Niek Bergboer wrote:
I've implemented a quick hack on the BSD ftp-client: in the original
recv-file function data is read from a socket into a buffer, which
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:43:29AM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
At 11:35 24/04/01 +0200, Niek Bergboer wrote:
[...]
In fact, I couldn't care less if the allocated blocks contain random
data (rather than zeros), since I'll be overwriting them immediately.
You *should* care: the blocks
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:54:26AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
PS: The tests were already done with the fs mounted async. The
drive in question communicates at UDMA/33 on a PIIX4 controller in
an AMD K6/2 233 system.
It's funny, but you have the ideal system for an interesting
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Niek Bergboer wrote:
I've implemented a quick hack on the BSD ftp-client: in the original
recv-file function data is read from a socket into a buffer, which is
then written to a file. I've mmap-ed the file, and rather than reading
from the socket into the buffer, I read
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 07:52:03AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Soft updates isn't an "async" or "sync" thing. It combines synchronous
and asynchronous transfers. If I'm not mistaken, all metadata is
synchronously written, and all data is asynchronously written.
You're mistaken, what
Hello,
I've got a machine connected to a 100 MBit/FDX network and I would like to store
largish (~20 MB or bigger) files on it that are downloaded from the network over a dc
card. The only consideration here is speed since the files are all temporary. I'm
running FreeBSD 4.3-RC1.
The dc card
ugh, dude, please wrap lines at 70 characters. :(
* Niek Bergboer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010420 05:43] wrote:
Hello,
I've got a machine connected to a 100 MBit/FDX network and I
would like to store largish (~20 MB or bigger) files on it that
are downloaded from the network over a dc card. The
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:54:26AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Niek Bergboer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010420 05:43] wrote:
b.) Are there other newfs options that I can use to increase throughput?
Have you tried softupdates?
Isn't it true that softupdates only work when filesystems are mounted
you really need to try harder to wrap lines properly.
* Niek Bergboer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010420 06:17] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:54:26AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Niek Bergboer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010420 05:43] wrote:
b.) Are there other newfs options that I can use to
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:20:29PM +0200, Niek Bergboer wrote:
Isn't it true that softupdates only work when filesystems are mounted
sync? Or does it also improve performance when filesystems are
mounted async?
The other guy was right; you really do need to wrap text at around 70
lines (I
11 matches
Mail list logo
