Re: UTF-8 - UTF-16BE Converter in Kernel Needs Test

2006-08-13 Thread Intron
Yoshihiro Ota wrote: You may try these patches, first. http://people.freebsd.org/~imura/kiconv/ It sounds like these patches implement better supports. Hiro On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:28:17 +0800 Intron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sorry that I send my experimental patch set here to call for

Re: UTF-8 - UTF-16BE Converter in Kernel Needs Test

2006-08-13 Thread R. Imura
Hi, Intron, - iconv(9), aka kiconv, is not implementation of POSIX iconv(3). - UDF is another kiconv user. - kiconv is not a present for Microsoft. - UCS-2 is not enough for explaining full GB18030. I'd like to know how Microsoft controls GB18030. 1. I don't know why the author takes the

UTF-8 - UTF-16BE Converter in Kernel Needs Test

2006-08-12 Thread Intron
I'm sorry that I send my experimental patch set here to call for test. But if I send it to freebsd-i18n@, I wonder no one will respond to me. Download: http://ftp.intron.ac/tmp/kiconv_utf8_20060813.tar.bz2 My patch set implements a UTF-8 - UTF-16BE converter for iconv in kernel. It doesn't need

Re: UTF-8 - UTF-16BE Converter in Kernel Needs Test

2006-08-12 Thread Yoshihiro Ota
You may try these patches, first. http://people.freebsd.org/~imura/kiconv/ It sounds like these patches implement better supports. Hiro On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:28:17 +0800 Intron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sorry that I send my experimental patch set here to call for test. But if I send it