On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:41:56PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
+. if ${CPUTYPE} == athlon-mp || ${CPUTYPE} == athlon-xp || ${CPUTYPE} ==
athlon-4 || ${CPUTYPE} == athlon
+_CPUCFLAGS = -march=${CPUTYPE}
. elif ${CPUTYPE} == k6-3
_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6-3
. elif ${CPUTYPE} == k6-2
Why
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:56:48AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
+. elif ${CPUTYPE} == athlon || ${CPUTYPE} == athlon-tbird
+MACHINE_CPU = athlon k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486 i386
Can you think of a situtation where the athlon/athlon-xp capabilities
would need to be tested? i.e. what would
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:08:23PM -0700, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Forgot that one. Here is an updated patch. I'm quite sure that on the
Intel side, only the pentium 4 have sse2, but I don't know if any AMD
chip supports it yet. The attached patch only adds it for p4's.
Athlon-{X,M}P support
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:30:26PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
`-mcpu=CPU-TYPE'
Tune to CPU-TYPE everything applicable about the generated code,
except for the ABI and the set of available instructions. The
choices for CPU-TYPE are `i386', `i486', `i586', `i686',
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 06:55:11PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
`-mcpu=CPU-TYPE'
Tune to CPU-TYPE everything applicable about the generated code,
except for the ABI and the set of available instructions. The
choices for CPU-TYPE are `i386', `i486', `i586', `i686',
In the last episode (Sep 06), Kris Kennaway said:
How about the following patch (I've only tested 'pentium3'):
Index: share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk
I've been using a similar patch ever since 3.* went into the tree with
no problems. Haven't benchmarked the difference between pentiumpro and
the other
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 06:55:11PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
`-mcpu=CPU-TYPE'
Tune to CPU-TYPE everything applicable about the generated code,
except for the ABI and the set of available instructions. The
choices for CPU-TYPE are `i386', `i486',
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:55:47PM -0700, Maxime Henrion wrote:
I've got a very similar patch which I believe to be a bit more complete
because it also updates the MACHINE_CPU variable which lists the
features available on a particular CPU. I attach it to this mail.
Oops, I forgot that
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:55:47PM -0700, Maxime Henrion wrote:
I've got a very similar patch which I believe to be a bit more complete
because it also updates the MACHINE_CPU variable which lists the
features available on a particular CPU. I attach it to this mail.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:08:23PM -0700, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:55:47PM -0700, Maxime Henrion wrote:
I've got a very similar patch which I believe to be a bit more complete
because it also updates the MACHINE_CPU variable which lists the
Maxime Henrion wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:55:47PM -0700, Maxime Henrion wrote:
I've got a very similar patch which I believe to be a bit more complete
because it also updates the MACHINE_CPU variable which lists the
features available on a particular
11 matches
Mail list logo
