What changed in ld?

I have recently upgraded from FreeBSD 3.1 to 4.3-20010525-STABLE. I wrote a very simple assembly language program that was giving me a bus error. For several hours I have been trying to find what was wrong with it, but could not. Finally, out of desperation, I moved uninitialized data from .bss

Re: What changed in ld?

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:42:34AM -0500, G. Adam Stanislav wrote: I have recently upgraded from FreeBSD 3.1 to 4.3-20010525-STABLE. And thus upgraded your assembler and linker from GNU Binutils 2.9.1 to 2.10.1. When you upgrade to 4.4-FreeBSD you will get GNU Binutils 2.11. That tells me

RE: What changed in ld?

On 01-Jun-01 G. Adam Stanislav wrote: I have recently upgraded from FreeBSD 3.1 to 4.3-20010525-STABLE. I wrote a very simple assembly language program that was giving me a bus error. For several hours I have been trying to find what was wrong with it, but could not. Finally, out of

Re: What changed in ld?

At 09:30 01-06-2001 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: This would be a question for the GNU Binutils mailing list to find out why they changed anything. Thank you. I did as you suggested, and found a solution. Thanks again, Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: What changed in ld?

G. Adam Stanislav wrote: At 09:30 01-06-2001 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: This would be a question for the GNU Binutils mailing list to find out why they changed anything. Thank you. I did as you suggested, and found a solution. I give: what was the soloution? -- Terry To Unsubscribe:

Re: What changed in ld?

At 17:15 01-06-2001 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Thank you. I did as you suggested, and found a solution. I give: what was the soloution? Oh, sorry. My original source placed all code into a .code section. The older ld did not care. The newer one expects the code to be in the .text section.