On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:04:06 MST, John Polstra wrote:
> OK, sounds good to me. In your private mail you seemed to be asking
> why only the debugging symbols are stripped from the kernel instead
> of stripping all symbols.
In that case, any objections to the patch I posted? :-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 14:26:41 MST, John Polstra wrote:
>
> > I don't understand what this has to do with how the kernel is
> > stripped.
>
> The current modules build attached to buildkernel doesn't generate
> modules wit
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 14:26:41 MST, John Polstra wrote:
> I don't understand what this has to do with how the kernel is
> stripped.
The current modules build attached to buildkernel doesn't generate
modules with debugging symbols, regardless of whether CONFIGARGS='-g'
was specified. I want to f
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When the kernel is built as kernel.debug, why is it passed through
> objcopy --strip-debug before being installed, instead of being passed
> through strip?
If you strip all of the symbols from the kernel then nothing t
Hi folks,
When the kernel is built as kernel.debug, why is it passed through
objcopy --strip-debug before being installed, instead of being passed
through strip?
Background: I recently found that the Handbook instructions for
"Debugging Loadable Modules Using GDB" is mostly useless for post-mo
5 matches
Mail list logo
