On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:15:00AM -0700, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> I will commit it. Please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] too.
>
> Jean-Marc
Thanks a lot, I have just submitted the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Andrew Hesford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Andrew Hesford writes:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:35:06AM -0500, Andrew Hesford wrote:
>> The solution is to comment out the calls to I810BindGARTMemory() and
>> I810UnbindGARTMemory() in the VT-switching functions. The end result is
>> that I810EnterVT() and I810LeaveVT() are now ide
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:15:02PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> BTW, Andrew, I really hope you do succeed (esp. with the recent
> 4.1.0 troubles). Thanks for investigating this!
>
> --Stijn
The problem is incredibly simple. I explain it and offer a patch in my
response to Will's messages.
As many
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:35:06AM -0500, Andrew Hesford wrote:
> The solution is to comment out the calls to I810BindGARTMemory() and
> I810UnbindGARTMemory() in the VT-switching functions. The end result is
> that I810EnterVT() and I810LeaveVT() are now identical in 4.1.0 to the
> ones in 4.0.1,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:59:15AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:32:50AM -0500, Andrew Hesford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The XFree86 4.0.1 sources *did* offer a helpful hint. I have posted
> > another email which includes a patch to fix the buggy i810 driver.
>
> Ar
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:59:15AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:32:50AM -0500, Andrew Hesford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The XFree86 4.0.1 sources *did* offer a helpful hint. I have posted
> > another email which includes a patch to fix the buggy i810 driver.
>
> Ar
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:32:50AM -0500, Andrew Hesford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The XFree86 4.0.1 sources *did* offer a helpful hint. I have posted
> another email which includes a patch to fix the buggy i810 driver.
Are you people talking about XFree86 4.1.0 or 4.0.1? Because
4.0.1 is >WA
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 11:20:45PM -0500, Andrew Hesford wrote:
> I hope somebody can provide more information. I am in the process of
> fetching and extracting the XFree86 4.0.1 sources, I will take a look at
> how they handled the ioctl. Unfortunately, I do not know enough about
> the design of
Many have had problems with the XFree86 and i810 or i815 chipsets under
FreeBSD. Specifically, the server crashes after switching to a text
console and switching back to the console X is running on. Unlike
versions 4.0.2 and 4.0.3 (4.0.1 magically works for me), 4.1.0 prints an
error message:
9 matches
Mail list logo