On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 05:02:39PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:37:18AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:32:07AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
About the only real improvement I'd like
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 01:23:39PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 09:28:28PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:37:18AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:32:07AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
0n Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 09:28:28PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:37:18AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:32:07AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
About the only real improvement I'd like to see in this setup is
0n Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:32:07AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
About the only real improvement I'd like to see in this setup is the
ability
to spin down idle drives. That would be an ideal setup for the home RAID
array.
There is a FreeBSD port which handles this,
Hi,
Recently, a ZFS pool on my FreeBSD box started showing lots of errors on
one drive in a mirrored pair.
The pool consists of around 14 drives (as 7 mirrored pairs), hung off of a
couple of SuperMicro 8 port SATA controllers (1 drive of each pair is on
each controller).
One of the
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:45:24AM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote:
Recently, a ZFS pool on my FreeBSD box started showing lots of errors on
one drive in a mirrored pair.
The pool consists of around 14 drives (as 7 mirrored pairs), hung off of
a couple of SuperMicro 8 port SATA controllers (1
--On 12 September 2008 06:21 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As far as I know, there is no such standard mechanism in FreeBSD. If
the drive falls off the bus entirely (e.g. detached), I would hope ZFS
would notice that. I can imagine it (might) also depend on if the disk
Karl Pielorz wrote:
Recently, a ZFS pool on my FreeBSD box started showing lots of errors on
one drive in a mirrored pair.
The pool consists of around 14 drives (as 7 mirrored pairs), hung off of a
couple of SuperMicro 8 port SATA controllers (1 drive of each pair is on
each
On September 12, 2008 02:45 am Karl Pielorz wrote:
Recently, a ZFS pool on my FreeBSD box started showing lots of errors
on one drive in a mirrored pair.
The pool consists of around 14 drives (as 7 mirrored pairs), hung off
of a couple of SuperMicro 8 port SATA controllers (1 drive of each
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 03:34:30PM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote:
--On 12 September 2008 06:21 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As far as I know, there is no such standard mechanism in FreeBSD. If
the drive falls off the bus entirely (e.g. detached), I would hope ZFS
would
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Did you try atacontrol detach to remove the disk from
the bus? I haven't tried that with ZFS, but gmirror
automatically detects when a disk has gone away, and
doesn't try to do anything with it anymore. It certainly
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:04:22AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
What this does to other parts of the kernel and userland applications is
something I haven't tested. I *can* tell you that there are major,
major problems with detach/reattach/reinit on ata(4) causing kernel
panics and other
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Karl Pielorz [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
--On 12 September 2008 06:21 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As far as I know, there is no such standard mechanism in FreeBSD. If
the drive falls off the bus entirely (e.g. detached), I would hope ZFS
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:04:27PM -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Did you try atacontrol detach to remove the disk from
the bus? I haven't tried that with ZFS, but gmirror
automatically detects when a disk has gone
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:04:27PM -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Did you try atacontrol detach to remove the disk from
the bus? I haven't
On September 12, 2008 09:32 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
For home use, sure. Since most home/consumer systems do not include
hot-swappable drive bays, rebooting is required. Although more and
more consumer motherboards are offering AHCI -- which is the only
reliable way you'll get that
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:12:09AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
On September 12, 2008 09:32 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
For home use, sure. Since most home/consumer systems do not include
hot-swappable drive bays, rebooting is required. Although more and
more consumer motherboards are
->
Re: ZFS w/failing drives - any equivalent of Solaris FMA?
freebsd-hackers
-- Thread --
-- Date --
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734";
google_alternate_ad_url =
18 matches
Mail list logo
