[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 September 2008 16:01
> To: Poul-Henning Kamp
> Cc: Bruce Cran; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Andrey V. Elsukov; Pegasus
> McCleaft
> Subject: Re: atacontrol broken in 7.1-PR
>
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll take care of it.
kib beat me to it...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubs
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:19:43PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I see the system has an Intel AHCI-based controller (probably an ICH10
> > chip, since the ICH10 is the first to support 6 SATA channels).
>
> No. I have an ICH8 with six channel
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Andrey V. Elsukov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi, Poul-Henning, I think it should be MFCed before release.
> I agree, but I'm ENOTIME.
I'll take care of it.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see the system has an Intel AHCI-based controller (probably an ICH10
> chip, since the ICH10 is the first to support 6 SATA channels).
No. I have an ICH8 with six channels, of which five are in use.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" writes:
>This is known problem and it fixed in CURRENT.
>You need to apply this patch:
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/atacontrol/atacontrol.c.diff?r1=1.47;r2=1.48
>
>I cc'ed person, who commited this fix.
>Hi, Poul-Henning, I thi
On Monday 29 September 2008 05:07:13 Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Bruce Cran wrote:
> > I'm also seeing this problem on my amd64 7.1-PRERELEASE system:
> >> atacontrol list
> >
> > ATA channel 0:
> > Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 5
> > Slave: no device present
> > atacontrol: ioctl(I
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:07:13AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Bruce Cran wrote:
>> I'm also seeing this problem on my amd64 7.1-PRERELEASE system:
>>
>>> atacontrol list
>> ATA channel 0:
>> Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 5
>> Slave: no device present
>> atacontrol: ioctl(IOC
Bruce Cran wrote:
I'm also seeing this problem on my amd64 7.1-PRERELEASE system:
atacontrol list
ATA channel 0:
Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 5
Slave: no device present
atacontrol: ioctl(IOCATADEVICES): Device not configured
I've attached the dmesg, and truss output from "a
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:36:03 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce and Pegasus,
>
> Can you please apply the below patch to src/sbin/atacontrol.c and let
> me know what the output is when doing "atacontrol list"?
>
> This won't solve the problem, but it will help in determining
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:07:44PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 03:07:48AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:36:03 -0700
> > Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Bruce and Pegasus,
> > >
> > > Can you please apply the below patch to src/sbin
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 03:07:48AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:36:03 -0700
> Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce and Pegasus,
> >
> > Can you please apply the below patch to src/sbin/atacontrol.c and let
> > me know what the output is when doing "atacontrol l
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 05:02:26PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:24:38PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:43:58 + (UTC)
> > Pegasus McCleaft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone.
> > >
> > > I was wondering if anyone else is exp
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:24:38PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:43:58 + (UTC)
> Pegasus McCleaft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this problem.
> > I have recently reloaded my machine (due to a mel
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:21:42AM +0100, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> On Sunday 28 September 2008 23:37:09 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>
> > > Yea.. The machine is otherwise running fine, and also loaded the driver
> > > for the ata raid controller (I made the machine boot off a raid-1 pack
> > > and
On Sunday 28 September 2008 23:37:09 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Yea.. The machine is otherwise running fine, and also loaded the driver
> > for the ata raid controller (I made the machine boot off a raid-1 pack
> > and made slices on the pack for /, /usr, /var . The rest zfs for
> > /usr/home)
>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:32:48PM +0100, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> On Sunday 28 September 2008 21:42:41 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:43:58AM +, Pegasus McCleaft wrote:
> > > I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this problem. I have
> > > recently reloaded
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:43:58 + (UTC)
Pegasus McCleaft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this problem.
> I have recently reloaded my machine (due to a meltdown of my primary
> boot drive) and noticed that under 7.0-rel the ata
On Sunday 28 September 2008 21:42:41 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:43:58AM +, Pegasus McCleaft wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this problem. I have
> > recently reloaded my machine (due to a meltdown of my primary boot
> > drive) and noticed t
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:43:58AM +, Pegasus McCleaft wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this problem. I have
> recently reloaded my machine (due to a meltdown of my primary boot
> drive) and noticed that under 7.0-rel the atacontrol command seems to
> work great
Hello everyone.
I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this problem. I
have recently reloaded my machine (due to a meltdown of my primary boot
drive) and noticed that under 7.0-rel the atacontrol command seems to work
great, however, under 7.1 I get and error
atacontrol: ioctl(IOCAT
21 matches
Mail list logo
