Re: bonnie still trustable?

2000-02-14 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
i personally like shimon's st.d... it exercises a disk very thoroughly, so if you want to benchmark - and, of course, have plenty of time for the box to run the benchmark - st.d is the choice since you got your free-of-charge(tm) burn in of the disk subsystem with it. what it basically does is

Re: bonnie still trustable?

2000-02-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: http://www.simon-shapiro.org/st_d/index.html I don't see anything that jumps out and tells me where to get this software, nor where I can get a printable version of the documentation. Shimon, can you help? The above URL links to the documentation,

Re: bonnie still trustable?

2000-02-14 Thread Greg Lehey
On Tuesday, 15 February 2000 at 2:37:58 +0100, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: Greg Lehey([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 03:16:50PM +1030: On Friday, 11 February 2000 at 10:49:24 +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: PIII/500, 128 MB I'm wondering if this is trustable: bonnie -s 400 File

Re: bonnie still trustable?

2000-02-12 Thread Greg Lehey
On Friday, 11 February 2000 at 10:49:24 +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: PIII/500, 128 MB I'm wondering if this is trustable: bonnie -s 400 File './Bonnie.14321', size: 419430400 Writing with putc()...done Rewriting...done Writing intelligently...done Reading with getc()...done Reading

bonnie still trustable?

2000-02-11 Thread Christoph Kukulies
PIII/500, 128 MB I'm wondering if this is trustable: bonnie -s 400 File './Bonnie.14321', size: 419430400 Writing with putc()...done Rewriting...done Writing intelligently...done Reading with getc()...done Reading intelligently...done Seeker 1...Seeker 2...Seeker 3...start