>
> You can set NOCLEAN in your environment. That will save you from
> having to rebuild things that didn't change. Major time saver if
> you're only working in a couple of files.
It's NO_CLEAN actually, and for the kernel building, it's especially
NO_KERNELCLEAN
Antoine Pelisse
-Glenn
At 04:36 PM 10/27/2005, Daniel Molina Wegener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:14:51AM -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 04:54 AM 10/27/2005 -0700, kamal kc wrote:
> | hello everybody,
> |
> | i am new to kernel programming.
> | i am developing a compression/decompression
> | functiona
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:14:51AM -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 04:54 AM 10/27/2005 -0700, kamal kc wrote:
> | hello everybody,
> |
> | i am new to kernel programming.
> | i am developing a compression/decompression
> | functionality in the ip layer.
> |
> | i want to compile the k
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello everybody,
>
> i am new to kernel programming.
> i am developing a compression/decompression
> functionality in the ip layer.
>
> i want to compile the kernel faster.
>
> it would
> be ok if the kernel doesn't
At 04:54 AM 10/27/2005 -0700, kamal kc wrote:
| hello everybody,
|
| i am new to kernel programming.
| i am developing a compression/decompression
| functionality in the ip layer.
|
| i want to compile the kernel faster.
|
| it would
| be ok if the kernel doesn't have support for sound
| device
hello everybody,
i am new to kernel programming.
i am developing a compression/decompression
functionality in the ip layer.
i want to compile the kernel faster.
it would
be ok if the kernel doesn't have support for sound
devices, or other devices like scsi,usb etc. because
i would be using the
6 matches
Mail list logo