On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
give the jail certian /dev
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:34:26 -0700
Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, that wasn't me. If I had to guess it was either mtm@ or mike@ (or
maybe some other Mike in the project).
Mike Makonnen (mtm@) commited a slightly modified version of my script.
Jail support is quite rudimentary.
I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
One strategy I saw was:
mount -t devfs devfs /home/jail/dev
( cd /home/jail/dev ; rm $devices_i_dont_want_in_my_jails )
mount -u -o nonewdev /home/jail/dev
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
Well, all I did was test your research :-)
One strategy I saw was:
mount -t
Josh Brooks wrote this message on Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00 -0700:
2. what is the current best practices strategy for mounting up a devfs
in a jail ?
man 8 devfs
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
All that I will do, has been done, All that I
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
Well, all I did was test your
6 matches
Mail list logo
