.
*default host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org
gimpy# csup /usr/local/etc/ports-supfile
Connected to 198.104.69.57
Updating collection ports-all/cvs
Edit ports/LEGAL
...
gimpy# dig a ftp.freebsd.org
...
ftp.freebsd.org.180 IN A 62.243.72.50
ftp.freebsd.org.180
I dont have any problems here, get a maximum connections exceeded message
though.
Hope this helps!
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:34:32PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
but I'm able to connect to cvsup5 and cvsup6.
The main ftp site says: Cannot connect to data port: Connection refused
This
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 16:34, Steven Friedrich wrote:
but I'm able to connect to cvsup5 and cvsup6.
The main ftp site says: Cannot connect to data port: Connection
refused
This started around the time of the cut-overs.
*default host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org
gimpy# csup /usr/local/etc/ports
On 12/5/06, Steven Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I'm able to connect to cvsup5 and cvsup6.
The main ftp site says: Cannot connect to data port: Connection refused
This started around the time of the cut-overs.
--
i386 FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE
There are 10 types of people in this world.
but I'm able to connect to cvsup5 and cvsup6.
The main ftp site says: Cannot connect to data port: Connection refused
This started around the time of the cut-overs.
--
i386 FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE
There are 10 types of people in this world. Ones that understand binary and
then, the others.
What happend to this host? I cannot ping it more than 10 hours.
harti
--
harti brandt,
http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Harti,
Just try one of the other mirrors.
cvsup[1-7]?.de.freebsd.org
cvsup[1-9]?.freebsd.org
/Oli
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Harti Brandt wrote:
What happend to this host? I cannot ping it more than 10 hours.
harti
--
harti brandt,
'^cvsup[0-9]' freebsd.org
18
try a mirror. try a local .de mirror. there is nothing 'special' about
cvsup.freebsd.org relative to the other public cvsup servers.
--
- bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ps. before anyone starts the quarterly round robin dns
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
Yah, I figured that out... I hadn't even considered it could happen wit
h
a brand new IBM drive! Ah well... back to the
tried-and-true-but-run-slightly-hot seacrates.
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:46:04PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
Unfortunately, it sounds like you're not alone. If you check out various
hardware message boards, there are people hopping mad about recent IBM
drives having a high failure rate. :|
But they support
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Brian Reichert wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:46:04PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
Sounds like the DTLA series drives.. The biggest piles of junk I've seen!in
quite a while.
Could someone give me a pointer to a current discussions concerning
these drives? I've been
I went through some of those messages myself. I didn't read any IBM
technical reps, only marketing dweebs who told people that it was
the controller, which is bullshit. PC motherboard controllers do not
cause hard read errors on disks.
In my case it was a hard-read error on
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:08:28AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:46:04PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
Unfortunately, it sounds like you're not alone. If you check out various
hardware message boards, there are people hopping mad about recent
Munish Chopra wrote:
I just finished reading this:
http://www.storagereview.com/jive/sr/thread.jsp?forum=1thread=13134
...it's a message board at a pretty decent storage site. There aren't
too many great posts, but what seems to be pretty consistent is that the
problems arise (in part)
Munish Chopra wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:45:16PM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
One interesting theory on there was that the drives were overheating and
somehow damanging themselves. Although this doesn't seem too likely,
I wonder if it isn't a catalyst.
Truthfully, that board
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure who to notify here... I tried twice, this looks like a
real error.
-Matt
/usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -r 20 -L 2 -h cvsup.freebsd.org
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile
: SetAttrs ports/emulators/sim6811/pkg-comment,v
: SetAttrs ports/emulators/sim6811/pkg-descr,v
: SetAttrs ports/emulators/sim6811/pkg-plist,v
: TreeList failed: Read failure from /usr/sup/ports-all/checkouts.cvs: Input/output
:error
:
:This is an I/O error happening on your own system when
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
Yah, I figured that out... I hadn't even considered it could happen with
a brand new IBM drive! Ah well... back to the
tried-and-true-but-run-slightly-hot seacrates.
-Matt
Unfortunately, it
Not sure who to notify here... I tried twice, this looks like a
real error.
-Matt
/usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -r 20 -L 2 -h cvsup.freebsd.org
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile
SetAttrs ports/emulators/sim6811/distinfo,v
SetAttrs ports/emulators
Oops. The I/O error is on my machine , not cvsup :-)
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
20 matches
Mail list logo
