Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Daniel O'Connor" writes: > Speaking of fetch features.. Are there any plans to make fetch use a > http proxy for ftp requests like ftp does? Yes. I intend to implement this in libfetch when I get around to rewriting the HTTP code. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubs

Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Speaking of fetch features.. Are there any plans to make fetch use a > http proxy for ftp requests like ftp does? Yes. I intend to implement this in libfetch when I get around to rewriting the HTTP code. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-05 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 06-Aug-99 John-Mark Gurney wrote: > metriclient-1,ttype,/tmp,501#tail squid.access > 933914913.491 3750 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/200 3816 GET > ftp://ftp.cdrom.com/config.txt - DIRECT/ftp.cdrom.com text/plain > > sure looks like it uses the http proxy, and this is on 3.0-R... Hmm.. sneaky :)

Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-05 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Daniel O'Connor scribbled this message on Aug 6: > On 05-Aug-99 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > "Chuck Youse" writes: > > > I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to > > > passive > > > mode, instead of requiring a

Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-05 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 06-Aug-99 John-Mark Gurney wrote: > metriclient-1,ttype,/tmp,501#tail squid.access > 933914913.491 3750 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/200 3816 GET > ftp://ftp.cdrom.com/config.txt - DIRECT/ftp.cdrom.com text/plain > > sure looks like it uses the http proxy, and this is on 3.0-R... Hmm.. sneaky :

Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-05 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Daniel O'Connor scribbled this message on Aug 6: > On 05-Aug-99 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > "Chuck Youse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to passive > > > mode, instead of requir

Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-05 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 05-Aug-99 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Chuck Youse" writes: > > I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to passive > > mode, instead of requiring a command-line switch ... > > fetch(1) honors FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. Speaking of fetch fe

Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-05 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 05-Aug-99 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Chuck Youse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to passive > > mode, instead of requiring a command-line switch ... > > fetch(1) honors FTP_PASSIVE_MO

Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Chuck Youse" writes: > I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to passive > mode, instead of requiring a command-line switch ... fetch(1) honors FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. d...@des /usr/freebsd/current% lcvs log -r1.31 src/etc/login.conf RCS file: /h

Re: fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Chuck Youse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to passive > mode, instead of requiring a command-line switch ... fetch(1) honors FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. des@des /usr/freebsd/current% lcvs log -r1.31 src/etc/login.

fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-04 Thread Chuck Youse
I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to passive mode, instead of requiring a command-line switch ... In this day and age, with firewalls and NAT abound, it's a bit odd that such a change has not already been made. Am I missing something? Is there a reason we ha

fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-04 Thread Chuck Youse
I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to passive mode, instead of requiring a command-line switch ... In this day and age, with firewalls and NAT abound, it's a bit odd that such a change has not already been made. Am I missing something? Is there a reason we ha