John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile?
Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-)
Add in another 50 here (the number of machines here that produce
dumps in
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:22:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
--- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001
+++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Public domain stdio wrapper for libz, written by Johan Danielsson.
+ */
Can we add this to libz or some other
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 02:04:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:22:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
--- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001
+++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Public domain stdio wrapper for libz,
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 01:16:31AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile?
As JDP said, YES!.
--- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001
+++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Public domain stdio wrapper for libz, written
Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile?
Should I also extend it to support bzip2'ed dumps now that that's in
the base system, or would that be overkill?
Kris
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile?
Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-)
Should I also extend it to support bzip2'ed dumps now that that's in
the base system, or would that
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:29:18PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile?
Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-)
:-)
Should I also extend it to
7 matches
Mail list logo