Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-04 Thread Michael Sinz
John Polstra wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-) Add in another 50 here (the number of machines here that produce dumps in

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:22:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: --- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001 +++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001 @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +/* + * Public domain stdio wrapper for libz, written by Johan Danielsson. + */ Can we add this to libz or some other

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-03 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 02:04:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:22:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: --- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001 +++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001 @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +/* + * Public domain stdio wrapper for libz,

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 01:16:31AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? As JDP said, YES!. --- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001 +++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001 @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +/* + * Public domain stdio wrapper for libz, written

gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? Should I also extend it to support bzip2'ed dumps now that that's in the base system, or would that be overkill? Kris Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-01 Thread John Polstra
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-) Should I also extend it to support bzip2'ed dumps now that that's in the base system, or would that

Re: gzipped crashdumps

2001-09-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:29:18PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile? Yes yes yes yes yes! That's 5 votes in favor of it already. :-) :-) Should I also extend it to