* Tim Kientzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040113 15:41] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >It will refuse to strip symbols if:
> >
> >foo.o:func1() references bar.o:func2().
> >
> >But I need it to.
>
> I suppose there are good reasons why you
> cannot compile everything into a single
> .o file for dis
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
It will refuse to strip symbols if:
foo.o:func1() references bar.o:func2().
But I need it to.
I suppose there are good reasons why you
cannot compile everything into a single
.o file for distribution?
> cat master.c
#include
#include
> gcc -o master.o master.c
Now you ha
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It will refuse to strip symbols if:
>
> foo.o:func1() references bar.o:func2().
>
> But I need it to.
use -G instead of -K, e.g.
$ strip -G apifunc1 -G apifunc2 foo.o
will make every symbol except apifunc1 and apifunc2 local.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smø
* Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040110 03:17] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm having a hell of a time doing this so I can produce a static
> > .o or .a with most of the symbols stripped. Two problems seem to be
> > that even if I use "ld -r -o main.o obj1.o
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm having a hell of a time doing this so I can produce a static
> .o or .a with most of the symbols stripped. Two problems seem to be
> that even if I use "ld -r -o main.o obj1.o obj2.c libfoo.a" then I
> can not strip symbols in obj1.o that are refe
This is driving me insane...
I would like to provide a client with a .o file so that he can link
static against my library. Unfortunatly I need to hide nearly all
the symbols in my object file.
For a shared object this works out super easy, all I do is generate
the .so file, then run strip -N on
6 matches
Mail list logo
