Sheldon Hearn scribbled this message on Jun 21:
You can expect the internal wrapping fixes and the SIGHUP bugfix to be
merged back to STABLE soon (within a week). I'm in no rush, and I'm glad
I didn't rush, since David Malone has already uncovered a bug in the
handling of maxchild, which I
on another note, LIBWRAP_INTERNAL looks like it must be defined for
internal services to be wrapped, yet it is not defined during freebsd's
compile -- only LIBWRAP is. yet freebsd's inetd man page says that internal
services may be wrapped. since it is not currently so by default, perhaps
On Sun, 20 Jun 1999 17:49:59 MST, Aaron Smith wrote:
unfortunately incoming telnet was still denied. at first i tried
HUPping inetd to reread the hosts.allow, but after looking at the
source it appears to re-read its information each time hosts_access is
called. has anyone else had problems
There was a bug in inetd in which ment that if you HUPed inetd it could
get confuesed about the name of the services. This is probably what you
are seeing. Sheldon has just committed a fix for this.
The wrapping of internal services isn't quite working properly yet. Sheldon
has committed a
In message 19990621110303.a7...@walton.maths.tcd.ie, David Malone writes:
wrapped (and it isn't possible to wrap tcp nowait services even with tcdp).
Is that what you meant to say, or am I getting confused? Did you mean udp,
or wait?
Of course - I ment tcp wait services.
David.
hi all,
[this is all on 3.2-RELEASE]
i recently had some problems getting inetd tcp wrappers to do the right
thing. i tried a sample configuration where i allowed telnet explicitly:
ALL : localhost : allow
telnetd : ALL : allow
ALL : ALL : deny
unfortunately incoming telnet was still denied.
6 matches
Mail list logo
