On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:50:04AM +0100, Sten Daniel S?rsdal wrote:
Apologies for the cross-post, i wasnt sure if this was hackers or net material.
I've often wondered why ip checksumming is done on every incoming
packet and not only on the packets that need to be delivered locally.
It
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:50:04AM +0100, Sten Daniel S?rsdal wrote:
Apologies for the cross-post, i wasnt sure if this was hackers or net material.
I've often wondered why ip checksumming is done on every incoming
packet and not only on the packets that need to be delivered locally.
It
Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
Apologies for the cross-post, i wasnt sure if this was hackers or net material.
I've often wondered why ip checksumming is done on every incoming
packet and not only on the packets that need to be delivered locally.
Only the IP header checksum is checked. We
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Besides that i'd like to add that FreeBSD has the fastest forwarding engine
i've seen on any free OS. It's in my opinion a very suitable OS for
routing/forwarding.
We are working on it to make it even faster. If you are using 5.2 or
-current
Apologies for the cross-post, i wasnt sure if this was hackers or net material.
I've often wondered why ip checksumming is done on every incoming
packet and not only on the packets that need to be delivered locally.
It looks like a very expensive way of doing it, especially on high
PPS.
5 matches
Mail list logo