>> mlock(2) says:
>>
>> > A single process can mlock() the minimum of a system-wide
>> > ``wired pages'' limit and the per-process RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
>> > resource limit.
>>
>> Shouldn't this say maximum rather than minimum?
>
> I don't think so. The minimum of the two would be the limit that you
> wi
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Dieter BSD wrote:
> mlock(2) says:
>
>> A single process can mlock() the minimum of a system-wide
>> ``wired pages'' limit and the per-process RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
>> resource limit.
>
> Shouldn't this say maximum rather than minimum?
I don't think so. The minimum of t
mlock(2) says:
> A single process can mlock() the minimum of a system-wide
> ``wired pages'' limit and the per-process RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
> resource limit.
Shouldn't this say maximum rather than minimum?
> [EAGAIN] Locking the indicated range would exceed either the
> system or per-process limit for
3 matches
Mail list logo