On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Cedric Tabary wrote:
If it is true, doing a sendfile() on some very big files (even if not
keeping the descriptor open after) will kill the cache ?
Please help me to understand why this patch ? and the difference between
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 18:20 +0100, Cedric Tabary wrote:
On 12/12/2005 08:38, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Cedric Tabary wrote:
If it is true, doing a sendfile() on some very big files (even if not
keeping the descriptor open after) will kill the cache ?
Please help me
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 18:20 +0100, Cedric Tabary wrote:
On 12/12/2005 08:38, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Cedric Tabary wrote:
If it is true, doing a sendfile() on some very big files (even if not
keeping the descriptor open after) will kill the cache ?
Please help me
I was looking at the freebsd port of thttpd and i saw this patch :
/usr/ports/www/thttpd/files/patch-mmc.c
This is some sort of file cache, it works by mmap()ing some files and
keeping the mmap address in a hashtable. I suppose this is used to keep
the file in memory until munmap() is called.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:39:30AM +0100, Cedric Tabary wrote:
This is some sort of file cache, it works by mmap()ing some files and
keeping the mmap address in a hashtable. I suppose this is used to keep
the file in memory until munmap() is called.
I guess this is used for accessing file's
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Cedric Tabary wrote:
If it is true, doing a sendfile() on some very big files (even if not
keeping the descriptor open after) will kill the cache ?
Please help me to understand why this patch ? and the difference between
sendfile() and mmap() at the memory or cache
On 12/12/2005 08:38, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Cedric Tabary wrote:
If it is true, doing a sendfile() on some very big files (even if not
keeping the descriptor open after) will kill the cache ?
Please help me to understand why this patch ? and the difference between
7 matches
Mail list logo