Re: nroff -man, .An Aq formatting

2010-03-23 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 22/03/2010 16:05, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote: It has come to my attention that whereas with LANG=C nroff -man formats .An name Aq email as name email, it uses different characters with LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 name ⟨email⟩. These characters are appropriate,

Re: nroff -man, .An Aq formatting

2010-03-23 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 22/03/2010 02:20, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/21/10 01:24, Dominic Fandrey wrote: It has come to my attention that whereas with LANG=C nroff -man formats .An name Aq email as name email, it uses different characters with LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 name ⟨email⟩. These characters are appropriate, but a

Re: nroff -man, .An Aq formatting

2010-03-22 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes: Dominic Fandrey d...@des.no writes: It has come to my attention that whereas with LANG=C nroff -man formats .An name Aq email as name email, it uses different characters with LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 name ⟨email⟩. These characters are appropriate, but a lot

Re: nroff -man, .An Aq formatting

2010-03-22 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote: It has come to my attention that whereas with LANG=C nroff -man formats .An name Aq email as name email, it uses different characters with LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 name ⟨email⟩. These characters are appropriate, but a lot of unicode fonts don't seem to

Re: nroff -man, .An Aq formatting

2010-03-22 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:05:52PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: And we probably have that usage in other man pages. It is not clear to me if the problem is the use of these characters for angle quotes or the use of .Aq for email addresses. I think the best option would be to sit down

nroff -man, .An Aq formatting

2010-03-21 Thread Dominic Fandrey
It has come to my attention that whereas with LANG=C nroff -man formats .An name Aq email as name email, it uses different characters with LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 name ⟨email⟩. These characters are appropriate, but a lot of unicode fonts don't seem to have them. Or else my terminal (rxvt-unicode) has

Re: nroff -man, .An Aq formatting

2010-03-21 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 21/03/2010 10:24 Dominic Fandrey said the following: It has come to my attention that whereas with LANG=C nroff -man formats .An name Aq email as name email, it uses different characters with LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 name ⟨email⟩. These characters are appropriate, but a lot of unicode fonts don't

Re: nroff -man, .An Aq formatting

2010-03-21 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 21/03/2010 11:02, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 21/03/2010 10:24 Dominic Fandrey said the following: It has come to my attention that whereas with LANG=C nroff -man formats .An name Aq email as name email, it uses different characters with LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 name ⟨email⟩. These characters are

Re: nroff -man, .An Aq formatting

2010-03-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 03/21/10 01:24, Dominic Fandrey wrote: It has come to my attention that whereas with LANG=C nroff -man formats .An name Aq email as name email, it uses different characters with LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 name ⟨email⟩. These characters are appropriate, but a lot of unicode fonts don't seem to have