On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Feb-09 09:43:01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
Personally, I think that's cool, but it does means it won't go into
the base system. Portupgrade would probably be in the base system if
it were written in a l
youshi10 wrote :
> > Personally, I think that's cool, but it does means it won't go into
> > the base system. Portupgrade would probably be in the base system if
> > it were written in a language in the base system.
> >
> > > --
> > Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > http://www.mired.org/cons
On 2007-Feb-09 09:43:01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
>>Personally, I think that's cool, but it does means it won't go into
>>the base system. Portupgrade would probably be in the base system if
>>it were written in a language in the base system.
>
>Would pe
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michel TALON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
Funny that i have just announced a program, that i have called pkgupgrade
(by analogy with portupgrade, i was not aware of his other work), and whose
aim is precisely to do the things you want
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michel TALON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Funny that i have just announced a program, that i have called pkgupgrade
> (by analogy with portupgrade, i was not aware of his other work), and whose
> aim is precisely to do the things you want - i don't pretend it succeeds
> perf
Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
> Been there, done that, cried. I've also tried portmanager and portmaster
> (which I'm using now with portsconf for source-based systems). My wish
> is pkg_update, which can be used to upgrade pkg_add'ed packages.
Funny that i have just announced a program, that i hav
[moved to ports@ with notice in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070207 07:17]:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joan Picanyol i Puig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > I know what I'd like: a utility in the base system for binary upgrading
> > of packages. More flexible logic in how the
[moved to ports@ with notice on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Ulrich Spoerlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070208 22:37]:
> Kip Macy wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
> >
> > >I know what I'd like: a utility in the base system for binary upgrading
> > >of packages. More flexible logic i
On 8/02/2007 9:02 AM, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
I know what I'd like: a utility in the base system for binary upgrading
of packages. More flexible logic in how the '-r' option is handled would
be nice (being able to fetch all packag
Kip Macy wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
>
> >I know what I'd like: a utility in the base system for binary upgrading
> >of packages. More flexible logic in how the '-r' option is handled would
> >be nice (being able to fetch all packages from All/ even if you are
> >on RE
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joan Picanyol i Puig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> * Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070207 01:05]:
> > If you let us know what your goals are, we might be able to help you
> > get there.
>
> I know what I'd like: a utility in the base system for binary upgrading
> of pack
portupgrade -aPP
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
* Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070207 01:05]:
If you let us know what your goals are, we might be able to help you
get there.
I know what I'd like: a utility in the base system for binary upgrading
of packages. More flex
* Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070207 01:05]:
> If you let us know what your goals are, we might be able to help you
> get there.
I know what I'd like: a utility in the base system for binary upgrading
of packages. More flexible logic in how the '-r' option is handled would
be nice (being abl
13 matches
Mail list logo
