Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 10:26:06AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said: > > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) > > wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It > > seems odd to have a knob called portmap_e

Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread Brian Somers
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brian Somers writes: > : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dima Dorfman writes: > : > : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) > : > : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It > : > : seems odd to have a knob cal

Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brian Somers writes: : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dima Dorfman writes: : > : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) : > : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It : > : seems odd to have a knob called portma

Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread Brian Somers
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dima Dorfman writes: > : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) > : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It > : seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts > : something called rpcbind (

Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Dima Dorfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010731 10:53] wrote: > David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > > Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said: > > > > > Does anybody know (r

Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dima Dorfman writes: : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It : seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts : something called rpcbind (not to men

Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread Dima Dorfman
David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said: > > > > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) > > > > wasn't rena

Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Jul-01 David Malone wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: >> Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said: >> > > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) >> > > wasn't renamed to rpcb

RE: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Jul-01 Dima Dorfman wrote: > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) > wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It > seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts > something called rpcbind (not to mention violating POL

Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread David Malone
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said: > > > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) > > > wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind?

Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread Dima Dorfman
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the last episode (Jul 31), Dima Dorfman said: > > Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) > > wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It > > seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually s

portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable

2001-07-31 Thread Dima Dorfman
Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob) wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts something called rpcbind (not to mention violating POLA). To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P