On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 09:46:14PM -, Dave McKay wrote:
Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories?
The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they
are third party software. I think the proper place for these
is the Bugtraq mailing list
Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories?
The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they
are third party software. I think the proper place for these
is the Bugtraq mailing list on securityfocus.com. Also to add
to the arguments, most of the advisories
Is it necessary to post ports security advisories? YES.
Should they be on this list? You think not. And until a list exists for
security on FreeBSD not related to core OS/packages, this is the best
forum for it, as it relates to FreeBSD Security.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dave McKay wrote
Dave McKay wrote:
Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories?
The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they
are third party software. I think the proper place for these
is the Bugtraq mailing list on securityfocus.com. Also to add
to the arguments, most
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ports security advisories..
Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories?
The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they
are third party software. I think the proper place for these
is the Bugtraq mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave McKay writes:
: Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories?
Yes.
: The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they
: are third party software. I think the proper place
6 matches
Mail list logo
