Anyone object greatly to making a change to the sx(9) API to use an sx_assert()
function similar to mtx_assert() for mutexes instead of having several
SX_ASSERT_FOO macros?
Here is what the new API would look like:
sx_assert(&foo_lock, SX_LOCKED);
sx_assert(&bar_lock, SX_SLOCKED);
vs.
SX_ASSERT_LOCKED(&foo_lock);
SX_ASSERT_SLOCKED(&bar_lock);
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
