tunefs.8 oddity

2007-07-20 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Hello, after spending a half an hour trying to help a friend of mine to turn soft updates on the root filesystem on I'd like to revert a part of rev. 1.21 just because it makes life of an average sysadmin easier: Index: tunefs.8 ===

Re: tunefs.8 oddity

2007-07-20 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 23:21+0800, Xin LI wrote: Maxim Konovalov wrote: Hello, after spending a half an hour trying to help a friend of mine to turn soft updates on the root filesystem on I'd like to revert a part of rev. 1.21 just because it makes life of an average sysadmin easier:

Re: tunefs.8 oddity

2007-07-20 Thread Xin LI
Maxim Konovalov wrote: Hello, after spending a half an hour trying to help a friend of mine to turn soft updates on the root filesystem on I'd like to revert a part of rev. 1.21 just because it makes life of an average sysadmin easier: Index: tunefs.8

Re: tunefs.8 oddity

2007-07-20 Thread Stefan Esser
Maxim Konovalov schrieb: On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 23:21+0800, Xin LI wrote: Maxim Konovalov wrote: Hello, after spending a half an hour trying to help a friend of mine to turn soft updates on the root filesystem on I'd like to revert a part of rev. 1.21 just because it makes life of an

Re: tunefs.8 oddity

2007-07-20 Thread Julian Elischer
Stefan Esser wrote: Maxim Konovalov schrieb: On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 23:21+0800, Xin LI wrote: Maxim Konovalov wrote: Hello, after spending a half an hour trying to help a friend of mine to turn soft updates on the root filesystem on I'd like to revert a part of rev. 1.21 just because it makes

Re: tunefs.8 oddity

2007-07-20 Thread Stefan Esser
Julian Elischer wrote: Stefan Esser wrote: Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, 23:21+0800, Xin LI wrote: Any chance that we resolve the bug instead of documenting it? :-) Personally, I have no energy/time for that. It was documented for ages, it is still documented in other BSDs.