san...@sanpei.org (MIHIRA Yoshiro) writes:
> # Yes, We modify some ports to support start,stop.
And others to no longer support it. The Apache 1.2 port used to
support it, the Apache 1.3 port doesn't. Here's a replacement:
#!/bin/sh
if [ ! -x /usr/local/sbin/apachectl ] ; then
echo "
David Scheidt writes:
> # cd /; (cd /cdrom; tar cvf - usr/share/examples/drivers ) | tar xvf -
> should work.
# cd /cdrom && tar cvf - usr/share/examples/drivers | tar xvf - -C /
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "uns
It seems Tommy Hallgren wrote:
> --- Mike Smith wrote:
> > We'd previously encountered problems with the Infortrend controller not
> > at all liking the other disks we'd tried to talk to; a collection of
> > Cheetahs with IBM and Compaq firmware simply wouldn't work. This time
> > we had bette
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Baker [SMTP:dba...@cuckoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 5:12 AM
> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Typo: sys/pci/pcisupport.c
>
> 4.0-CURRENT: sys/pci/pcisupport.c:
>
> 955:/* VIA Technologies -- vendor 0x1106 &/
> 956:
> > 955:/* VIA Technologies -- vendor 0x1106 &/
> > 956:case 0x05861106: /* south bridge section */
> > 957:return ("VIA 82C586 PCI-ISA bridge");
> >
> > This is cute. Moo.
> [ML] Yes. A comment-within-a-comment compiler warning would
> have been nice
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Daniel Baker wrote:
> 4.0-CURRENT: sys/pci/pcisupport.c:
>
> 955:/* VIA Technologies -- vendor 0x1106 &/
> 956:case 0x05861106: /* south bridge section */
> 957:return ("VIA 82C586 PCI-ISA bridge");
>
> This is cute. Moo.
Fixed. Thanks.
- b
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Hibma [SMTP:nick.hi...@jrc.it]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 2:27 PM
> To: Ladavac Marino
> Cc: FreeBSD hackers mailing list
> Subject: RE: Typo: sys/pci/pcisupport.c
> It does, just no one checking. Someone needs to go and fix warnings
> again
> pointer->pointer->object.method;
>
> where he wanted
>
> pointer->pointer->object.method();
>
> hpux CC did not say a word. Naturally, the method had desired
> side effects :)
Port your application to see more compiler warnings. It sounds like
perl -e 'use strict
>
> There is a story behind it: our product was shipping for hpux
> and was later ported to sinix. It had some instabilities during
> development (it was first developed for hpux, then the enhancements were
> ported to sinix, almost in parallel).
>
> A colleague wrote (paraphrased)
> > > We'd previously encountered problems with the Infortrend controller not
> > > at all liking the other disks we'd tried to talk to; a collection of
> > > Cheetahs with IBM and Compaq firmware simply wouldn't work. This time
> > > we had better luck with real Seagate firmware, and the arra
Yesterday I was able to mount my CD-ROM just fine. Today after
a lot of kernel hacking I am not. I am fairly new at this so
this may be a really easy answer.
I have an entry in the "fstab" file that references my cdrom
/dev/wcd0c /cdromro, noauto 0 0
but when I goto "mount /cdrom" I get
Yesterday I was able to mount my CD-ROM just fine. Today after
a lot of kernel hacking I am not. I am fairly new at this so
this may be a really easy answer.
I have an entry in the "fstab" file that references my cdrom
/dev/wcd0c /cdromro, noauto 0 0
but when I goto "mount /cdrom" I get
Once morpheus_...@depechemode.com aka (morpheus_...@depechemode.com) said:
> Yesterday I was able to mount my CD-ROM just fine. Today after
> a lot of kernel hacking I am not. I am fairly new at this so
> this may be a really easy answer.
> I have an entry in the "fstab" file that references my cd
Is this board supported? Anyone using them?
Dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In article <53425.929320...@zippy.cdrom.com> you write:
>> And have /usr/bin point to /binaries/i386/bin or /binaries/mips/bin
>
>And before people jump on me, let me just clarify in advance that I
>was not meaning to imply that Apollo ever used the x86 architecture.
>They didn't. It was just an e
I don't seem to be able to get 3.2 to do a SL/IP
install (this is for a laptop which seems to be
having PAO problems...)
Turning on DEBUG in the install options, I can watch
it nicely execute:
ifconfig sl0 inet 10.0.0.98 10.0.0.99 netmask 255.255.255.0
but - not matter what - that always seems
On Thu, 20 May 1999, The Tech-Admin Dude wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I could add another one, top(1) frequently does that on this machine..
> so whatever answers you get, be sure to forward them to me :).
Blast from the past, but since no one gave you an
> I've ported PC-card boot.flp to -current.
>
> Source patch can be found at
>
> http://wing-yee.ntc.keio.ac.jp/hosokawa/pccard-flp/current-diff-19990616.tar.
gz
I was offline for a while - apologies for not getting back to you.
I have the new ones, and my box is busy buil
>
>
> I don't seem to be able to get 3.2 to do a SL/IP
> install (this is for a laptop which seems to be
> having PAO problems...)
>
> Turning on DEBUG in the install options, I can watch
> it nicely execute:
>
> ifconfig sl0 inet 10.0.0.98 10.0.0.99 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> but - not matter
Does anybody ever used this option?
options BOOTP_NFSROOT
I'd like to use it, to boot a computer from a boot disk, and start a
diskless station by mounting via NFS all the file system.
The problem is that I don't know how to use it.
and I don't know how to make the disk boot without using MFS_R
At a chipset level (DEC 21143) yes...in the same way a Znyx card would
work.
It looks like the card also uses a DEC bridge chip too (not unussual on
multi-port Ethernet cards) and FreeBSD will also cope fine with that too.
HOWEVER...be aware that some BIOSes mess up the initialization of such
bea
To add more to this - tracing through in.c in the kernel,
I see that when you configure an interface it eventually
works its way down to rtrequest - to add a route for
the new interface.
I believe rtrequest() is the one returning EEXIST which is
what causes ifconfig on sl0 to always complain "Fil
As Willem Jan Withagen wrote ...
> In article <53425.929320...@zippy.cdrom.com> you write:
> >> And have /usr/bin point to /binaries/i386/bin or /binaries/mips/bin
> >
> >And before people jump on me, let me just clarify in advance that I
> >was not meaning to imply that Apollo ever used the x86 a
On 16-Jun-99 Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 16-Jun-99 John Baldwin wrote:
>> Whoops.. just ifconfig de0. Have you tried using the interface? We use
>> for a lab I help run, and 'arp -a' on the clients does not show an entry
>> for
>> the local de0 card they have installed, but they work fine
dro...@rpi.edu said:
:- While others seemed too busy with "new" technology to bother with
:- ugly-old-NFS problems, Matt dived in and pursued them with enough
:- enthusiasm to make a real difference.
In particular, lots of NFS bugs that had been there, and reported,
since early 2.2 days. Bugs th
Well -
I've added some printf()s to determine that what I suspected
was correct. The route is being entered into the table
twice.
If looks like in_ifinit() is calling the sioctl() routine,
which calls if_up(), which then adds the route.
Then, in_ifinit() goes on to add another route and *p
At 05:06 PM 6/16/99 -0400, you wrote:
>At a chipset level (DEC 21143) yes...in the same way a Znyx card would
>work.
>
>It looks like the card also uses a DEC bridge chip too (not unussual on
>multi-port Ethernet cards) and FreeBSD will also cope fine with that too.
>
>HOWEVER...be aware that some
In article <199906161952.vaa05...@gratis.grondar.za>
m...@grondar.za writes:
>> I was offline for a while - apologies for not getting back to you.
>>
>> I have the new ones, and my box is busy building world with them right
>> now.
>>
>> I'll commit if nobody else can/wants to...
Please note th
In article <19990608084217.a5...@alaska.cert.siemens.de>,
Udo Schweigert wrote:
> I'm using it (runsocks cvsup -P m) for a year now and it works
> without any problems. (Since cvsup 16 the "-P m" is not needed, so
> "runsocks cvsup" should so it).
Just to make sure I understand: You're using st
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>
> To add more to this - tracing through in.c in the kernel,
> I see that when you configure an interface it eventually
> works its way down to rtrequest - to add a route for
> the new interface.
>
> I believe rtrequest() is the one returning EEXIST which is
> what cau
>
> Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> >
> > To add more to this - tracing through in.c in the kernel,
> > I see that when you configure an interface it eventually
> > works its way down to rtrequest - to add a route for
> > the new interface.
> >
> > I believe rtrequest() is the one returning EEXIST
On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Robert Withrow wrote:
>
> dro...@rpi.edu said:
> :- While others seemed too busy with "new" technology to bother with
> :- ugly-old-NFS problems, Matt dived in and pursued them with enough
> :- enthusiasm to make a real difference.
>
> In particular, lots of NFS bugs that ha
Hi,
I've been doing some work which caused me to want to write a simple
userland bridging/filtering program (don't ask ;-). The easy way to do it
seemed to be to use BPF to read and write the packets one each side. I
wrote something up in a few hundred lines of code which worked (mostly) as
long
Load balancing will always be done at the driver level, and not in board
logic...you want those separate MACs etc. :-)
This is true of all the boards I'm familiar with.
I'm actually trying to implement EtherChannel under FreeBSD for Znyx
boards right now.
-marc
> Hi,
>
> I've been doing some work which caused me to want to write a simple
> userland bridging/filtering program (don't ask ;-). The easy way to do it
ok, i won't ask, just remind you that freebsd (in 2.2.8, 3.2, 4.x)
has bridging integrated with the ipfw so you can do bridging and
filtering
35 matches
Mail list logo