In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Black writes:
Matt Dillon wrote:
And, I would say, that for any mailer creating and deleting files in
a spool directory at a high rate, *ONLY* a filesystem with softupdates
turned on or a journaling filesystem such as XFS or ReiserFS can be
unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
* Josef Grosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010207 07:31]:
I'm fooling around with java and have installed the linux port of java 1.3
on a 4.2-STABLE system (last cvsuped and make world on Jan 30). I'm running
a very simple java program ;
It compiles cleanly but when I run it I get ;
erie% java
unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Black writes:
Matt Dillon wrote:
It seems to me that you're saying that softupdates is now the
recommended way to go -- so why does 4.2-Release still have the
dire warnings in /sys/ufs/ffs/README.softupdates? Is that file
Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Qmail has a couple of directories for the different states a queued
message goes through. The whole queue structure is required to be on
the same partition/disk. After the completing of each step in the queue
it is moved through the use of link() and then
Tony Finch wrote:
Why not just use rename(2)? To protect against the new filename
already existing?
Why not just read the man page for rename(2) before making
suggestions?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Maxime Henrion writes:
What do you think of what NetBSD implemented ? softupdates is now enabled via
a mount option. This seems cleaner than the tunefs -n enable thing.
I have never understood why it was a tunefs thing...
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since
It its the bios disk probe that is causing the machine to fault.
I suppose you really dont need to probe the disks when you are netbooting.
Danny Braniss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
im now being bitten by this one, but with a twist:
on a compaq deskpro workstation it's ok
on a dell-precision
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Maxime Henrion writes:
What do you think of what NetBSD implemented ? softupdates is now enabled vi
a
a mount option. This seems cleaner than the tunefs -n enable thing.
I have never understood why it was a tunefs thing...
So
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Wemm writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Maxime Henrion writes:
What do you think of what NetBSD implemented ? softupdates is now enabled vi
a
a mount option. This seems cleaner than the tunefs -n enable thing.
I have
At 21:25 07/02/01 +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Tony Finch wrote:
Why not just use rename(2)? To protect against the new filename
already existing?
Why not just read the man page for rename(2) before making
suggestions?
I find nothing convincing in the manpage. Could you please tell
what I am
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:48:26PM -0500, Ed Gold wrote:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
This would work better if you actually read the mails you're receiving,
and send the update request to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:43:00PM +0300, Dmitry Dicky wrote:
unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
This would work better if you actually read the mails you are receiving,
and send the
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, milunovic wrote:
Is there anyway to deny echo request on FreeBSD (except ipfw add deny
icmp from any to any) ?
On Linux It was simple,just echo 1/proc/.../icmp_echo_request
If you just want to block echo_requests and don't want to
block any other ICMP
Matthew Luckie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have written a KLD module that implements a syscall
I wrote this module on 3.2-release, although this module is going to be
used on a 3.0-release machine
Don't run 3.0.
Is it possible for me to hack my kernel module to work on freebsd
3.0-release?
Thanks for this.
For what its worth:
I have made the kernel module work with 3.0-release using the LKM
interface instead, calling the MOD_SYSCALL wrapper (or whatever its
called, can't remember). the examples of writing and calling an lkm
syscall probably reflect the lkm interface itself.
I was
Matthew Luckie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I completely understand your plea to not use 3.0 release.
I am personally using 4.2-stable. Its not my decision to use 3.0
I beleive the computers running 3.0 have been running it for several years
now - i.e. it was the latest available at the time.
mouss wrote:
At 21:25 07/02/01 +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Tony Finch wrote:
Why not just use rename(2)? To protect against the new filename
already existing?
Why not just read the man page for rename(2) before making
suggestions?
I find nothing convincing in the manpage. Could you
I went over to postfix to see if it did better.in fact it did on
freebsd but still same problem with I/O. SOlution from talking to some
people late last night would be to add another harddrive and stripe it
with another drive using vinum. As you all know IDE does not do
multitasking unlike
Well, that's a jump. You never said how bumping maxusers went!
However, we have finally gotten a clue to how much mail you are pushing..
600MB in a day. That sure doesn't sound like something I would want
to run a machine with an IDE drive. Why not just buy one of those
Yes maxusers stopped the dmesg errorsit seemed. Only thing I do not
like to much about postfix is that it only tries one MX record and then
does not try any others"default"yes there is still backlog with
#'s I gave you. Right now 8 min to get an email from sending...I have
another
* Dan Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010207 13:42] wrote:
Yes maxusers stopped the dmesg errorsit seemed. Only thing I do not
like to much about postfix is that it only tries one MX record and then
does not try any others"default"yes there is still backlog with
#'s I gave you.
* Greg Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010207 13:05] wrote:
mouss wrote:
At 21:25 07/02/01 +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Tony Finch wrote:
Why not just use rename(2)? To protect against the new filename
already existing?
Why not just read the man page for rename(2) before making
Sounds reasonable...do you have a url to a trustable supplier?
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:08:43 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dan Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
* Dan Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010207 15:30] wrote:
Get a hardware raid card, you can even get a bootable IDE RAID,
although hotswap scsi means less downtime.
For a project this big you're really being pretty thrifty with the
hardware allocated to it. The time you save hacking on
Hey everyone,
Sorry if you have heard this before, or if it is annoying. I just can't
seem to find any information on this.
I have been poking around my kernel for quite some time now, and I have
been doing it with various text editors and programs of that nature. It
suddenly occured to me that
It's bad form to use "reply" when starting a new thread, people with
normal mailers see your message as part of a thread that it's not
related to.
* Kevin Brunelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010207 16:25] wrote:
Hey everyone,
Sorry if you have heard this before, or if it is annoying. I just can't
Hi!
I'm not sure if I'm posting this in the right place or not, or who's going
to end up reading it, but here goes...
I installed FreeBSD the other day, and accepted the Auto-defaults for
partitions (/usr, /var, etc.) and the installation went fine. I then
proceeded to install a few ports,
* Sean Cull [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010207 16:55] wrote:
Hi!
I'm not sure if I'm posting this in the right place or not, or who's going
to end up reading it, but here goes...
I installed FreeBSD the other day, and accepted the Auto-defaults for
partitions (/usr, /var, etc.) and the
May some one give me some help where i can find documentation on
building my own boot floppy disk for freebsd ?
Thanks in advance!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Greg Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010207 13:05] wrote:
mouss wrote:
At 21:25 07/02/01 +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Tony Finch wrote:
Why not just use rename(2)? To protect against the new filename
already existing?
Why not just read the man page
On Wednesday, 7 February 2001 at 13:41:29 -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
btw ccd requires 2 other drives am i correct?
No, you can use ccd with only 2 drives.
So i just remove /var/ basically from fstab ...raid0 2 drives together
and mount that as var...is my basic understanding.
of course of
On Wednesday, 7 February 2001 at 13:31:26 -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
In anycase, while VINUM is great for striping disks I recommend that
you use CCD to begin with, because CCD is a whole lot less complex.
You can stripe IDE drives but the two drives must be on different IDE
On Wednesday, 7 February 2001 at 13:16:44 -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 12:13:57PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010206 12:07] wrote:
Does sendmail even use fsync()?
It better. :)
Quick
VI FOR LIFE
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Kevin Brunelle wrote:
Hey everyone,
Sorry if you have heard this before, or if it is annoying. I just can't
seem to find any information on this.
I have been poking around my kernel for quite some time now, and I have
been doing it with various text
* Greg Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010207 17:33] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Greg Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010207 13:05] wrote:
mouss wrote:
At 21:25 07/02/01 +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Tony Finch wrote:
Why not just use rename(2)? To protect against the new
I have been poking around my kernel for quite some time now, and I have
been doing it with various text editors and programs of that nature. It
suddenly occured to me that there might be a better way to go about
this. So I ask you, are there any programs that make reading and editing
the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey everyone,
Sorry if you have heard this before, or if it is annoying. I just can't
seem to find any information on this.
I have been poking around my kernel for quite some time now, and I have
been doing it with various text editors and
:Yes maxusers stopped the dmesg errorsit seemed. Only thing I do not
:like to much about postfix is that it only tries one MX record and then
:does not try any others"default"yes there is still backlog with
:#'s I gave you. Right now 8 min to get an email from sending...I have
On 7 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Matthew Luckie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I completely understand your plea to not use 3.0 release.
I am personally using 4.2-stable. Its not my decision to use 3.0
I beleive the computers running 3.0 have been running it for several years
now -
On 7 Feb 2001, at 21:14, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
On 7 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Matthew Luckie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I completely understand your plea to not use 3.0 release.
I am personally using 4.2-stable. Its not my decision to use 3.0
I beleive the computers
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7 Feb 2001, at 21:14, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
On 7 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Matthew Luckie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I completely understand your plea to not use 3.0 release.
I am personally using 4.2-stable. Its not my
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios wrote:
May some one give me some help where i can find documentation on
building my own boot floppy disk for freebsd ?
Most info about the FreeBSD OS can be obtained via the website
at:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Kevin Brunelle wrote:
Sorry if you have heard this before, or if it is annoying. I just can't
seem to find any information on this.
I have been poking around my kernel for quite some time now, and I have
been doing it with various text editors and programs of that
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:56:14PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:26:15PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed. I've been doing a ``make build'' on an OpenBSD-current vm
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:26:15PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed. I've been doing a ``make build'' on an OpenBSD-current vm
for three days (probably about 36 hours excluding suspends) on a
366MHz laptop with a ATA33 disk.
Would it be
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:26:15PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed. I've been doing a ``make build'' on an OpenBSD-current vm
for three days (probably about 36 hours excluding suspends) on a
366MHz laptop with a ATA33 disk.
Would it be
Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed. I've been doing a ``make build'' on an OpenBSD-current vm
for three days (probably about 36 hours excluding suspends) on a
366MHz laptop with a ATA33 disk.
Would it be possible for someone experiencing this slowdown to try to
narrow down the
Hmm, I have exactly the same situation, a mission-critical server that
can't be taken offline to do an upgrade. It's running 3.4, but with a few
binaries from 4.0 that I needed to make our CGIs work (development is done
on 4.2 :).
Anyway, for the kernel it MIGHT be possible to "borrow" one from
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:16:44PM -0800, Dan Phoenix scribbled:
| I went over to postfix to see if it did better.in fact it did on
| freebsd but still same problem with I/O. SOlution from talking to some
| people late last night would be to add another harddrive and stripe it
| with another
Hi Mens,
it's exact that filers can't exceed 6TB but we can have eaysyly performance
(pretty so good) with their.
If you try to have EMC box or IBM, you will have to manage anything that
it's not your job (IO for example).
I think that netapp can be a very simple solution (where other man
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 05:18:22PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
I'm working one some code which among other things introduces a new
ioctl interface for IEEE802.11 devices. Since there are a number of
useful apps which might want to use this iterface and a number of
drivers which will need to
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:56:14PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 08:26:15PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed. I've been doing a ``make build'' on an OpenBSD-current vm
for three days (probably about 36 hours
On 7 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed. I've been doing a ``make build'' on an OpenBSD-current vm
for three days (probably about 36 hours excluding suspends) on a
366MHz laptop with a ATA33 disk.
Would it be possible for someone
55 matches
Mail list logo
