does that mean that whenever a new device or a new driver is add to
the system ,a corresponding deviceclass will equally be created,
am i right ,sir?
Yes. That's right.
Warner
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
From: william wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: misc questions about the devicedriver arch
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 13:39:08 +0800
comparing the method array of pci_pci and cardbusbridge:
what losts in pci bridge but exist in cardbusbridge:
1 card interface
2 power interface
3 some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
It came to my attention that some LC_CTYPE source files for UTF-8,
UTF-8.src and zh_TW.UTF-8.src, are inconsistent with all other
LC_CTYPE source files. The literals in all other LC_CTYPE source
files, including am_ET.UTF-8.src, are written in
Um that is what intr is for - and it won't cause silent data loss.
-Kip
On 5/19/06, Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyway the big question is how can I change all our NFS
mounts so that failed mounts dont prevent the machines
booting to
Hi all,
Doubts !
I created to screensaver for console.
The code would like to know as sending, to be enclosed in src of the
FreeBSD.
Thanks,
Eder.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
still a question about newbus 's BUS interface :
usage of DEVICE_IDENTIFY AND BUS_ADD_CHILD
I know these bus interface func r called accessor functions ,that call
the appropriate function by checking the parameter.just like the
polymorphism technic in OOP . that's really a magic :)
my first
william wallace wrote this message on Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:42 +0800:
still a question about newbus 's BUS interface :
usage of DEVICE_IDENTIFY AND BUS_ADD_CHILD
I know these bus interface func r called accessor functions ,that call
the appropriate function by checking the parameter.just
7 matches
Mail list logo
