yeah I remembered how it all worked after I wrote that..
You'd think they'd eventually get the idea of letting the kernel have it's
own 'cr3' and some TLBs eh?
listenning intel?
On 8 Jul 1999, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julian Elischer) writes:
we already use the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julian Elischer) writes:
we already use the gs register for SMP now..
what about the fs register?
I vaguely remember that the different segments could be used to achieve
this (%fs points to user space or something)
You can't extend the address space that way,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patryk Zadarnowski) writes:
You can't extend the address space that way, segments are all parts of
the single 4GB address space described by the page mapping.
True, but you can reserve a part of the 4GB address space (say 128MB of it)
for partitioning into tiny (say
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Jamie Howard wrote:
The FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD manpage for grep says this:
Grep understands two different versions of regular expression
syntax: ``basic'' and ``extended.'' In GNU grep, there is
no difference in available functionality
On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 00:03:10 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
I have done. As far as I can tell, the submitter is saying "Yes, the
information I was looking for was in the manual page, but it (specifically,
that the "root" account doesn't use the "default" entry) is buried as
a throw away
hi to all,
i have a freebsd installed with internet connection on
my desktop pc and on my laptop as well. because i am
traveling a lot between two countries, i'd like to
make followings.
- laptop dials to my desktop pc
- laptop sends some command
- desktop hangs up and dials to local isp
-
Geza Fodor wrote:
i have a freebsd installed with internet connection on
my desktop pc and on my laptop as well. because i am
traveling a lot between two countries, i'd like to
make followings.
You should be able to write some scripts which do this; theoretically,
the "some commands to
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:54:42 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dfr If I understand this correctly, you are suggesting that we program timer0
dfr so that we only take interrupts when a finetimer is due to fire? If so,
dfr then it sounds very good. The idea of taking 6000+
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
Hello!
I am new to FreeBSD and Unix, but not new to programming and TCP/IP.
I have noticed that there is no good clipboard system in FreeBSD. X has
only a rudimentary clipboard, and outside X there is no clipboard that
would be shared between
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:54:42 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dfr If I understand this correctly, you are suggesting that we program timer0
dfr so that we only take interrupts when a finetimer is due to fire? If so,
dfr then it
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 11:00:24 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There is one problem in this method. acquire_timer0() is only implemented
for i386. We would need to write something equivalent for alpha...
dfr The timer hardware on the alpha is essentially the same but the
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
I have noticed that there is no good clipboard system in FreeBSD. X has only
a rudimentary clipboard, and outside X there is no clipboard that would be
shared between programs... All this while Windows has a very interesting
clipboard system that
:yeah I remembered how it all worked after I wrote that..
:You'd think they'd eventually get the idea of letting the kernel have it's
:own 'cr3' and some TLBs eh?
:
:listenning intel?
This is intel we are talking about. Their mmu/cache technology is
always a few years behind the times.
If someone in the FS dept. would draw up a broad outline for FS implementation
I hereby volunteer to flesh it out thoroughly and donate the end-product docs to
the FreeBSD project. I am a professional UNIX (AIX/SOLARIS) programmer and
fairly clueful kernel source peruser and tweaker, fully
If a system runs out of mbufs can memory be claimed from elsewhere
or is the system pretty much dead especially for networking related
allocations.
jayanth
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
However, we have at least one industrial-type system (with a
different board/config) that works fine with these cards, though we didn't
do the install with one. I'll try that tomorrow and report my findings.
Though the cards seem to work post-install, they fail in the
install
Nope, I did read the docs, hence the patch to the manpage to make
it stand out more clearly. I still am of the opinion that "default" should
mean "default" for everyone. AFIK, there are no other fields in passwd
that have different interpretations/defaults depending upon the UID. This
However, we have at least one industrial-type system (with a
different board/config) that works fine with these cards, though we didn't
do the install with one. I'll try that tomorrow and report my findings.
Though the cards seem to work post-install, they fail in the
install
program... but if I go into the installer and try to transfer a
distribution , it fails, locking in the same way. I'm talking with Intel
to see if they have had similar problems. I read something in the source
about the reciever has locked after garbage in the syncronization bits...
could
this is problematic.
you cannot add a new element before the pending firing because you can't
tell how far into the present trigger you are.
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 19:46:38 -0700 (PDT),
Julian Elischer
Hi!
I saw your posting on the HU list and was actually able to understand the
Subject: line!
(I guess it wasn't that difficult)
It's fun to se the 'correct translation' so I could compare..
julian
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Geza Fodor wrote:
hi to all,
i have a freebsd installed with
Hi,
The following program returns an inconsistant rc/errno value.
Setting a bit corresponding to filedescriptor which is not open
is only found when it is less than 20. ie:
Some example output follows along with the program. This is being
run on a -current system. If I open a file on fd
I'm not asking any of you to prepare a resume - we're starting JUST with
the core team bios and pictures here. :)
i knew you were not humans...
cheers
luigi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of
In article local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
write:
Hi,
The following program returns an inconsistant rc/errno value.
Setting a bit corresponding to filedescriptor which is not open
is only found when it is less than 20. ie:
This is because initially, only 20 descriptors are
:This is because initially, only 20 descriptors are allocated, and
:the system is quietly ignoring any descriptors over the allocated
:amount:
:
:if (uap-nd p-p_fd-fd_nfiles)
:uap-nd = p-p_fd-fd_nfiles; /* forgiving; slightly wrong */
:
:This should be:
:
:if
On Jul 07, 1999 at 02:33:19PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Not unless you want to blow up virtually every program that uses select!!!
Passing an nd parameter that is greater then the current number of
descriptors is perfectly valid. It's setting a bit in the bitmask for
one
:Hmm, you're right. Arguably, it could return EINVAL. Actually, the
:man page documents this behavior, although it gets the 256 number wrong.
:
: If nfds is greater than the number of open files, select() is not guaran-
: teed to examine the unused file descriptors. For historical
-hackers,
Tim Singletary has written some man pages for the dbm_* functions in libc,
which are currently undocumented -- we know they are written in terms
of dbopen(), but it's nice to have them documented anyway.
Could anyone who knows anything about DBM take a look at docs/12557 and
let me
I just wondered if this should be integrated into ptrace(), so
the various debuggers wouldn't have to know about it.
It seems that would be the proper abstraction - hardware that supports
it would "have it" - and the programs that "used it" wouldn't have to
know anything special.
I only have
hi to all,
i have a freebsd installed with internet connection on
my desktop pc and on my laptop as well. because i am
traveling a lot between two countries, i'd like to
make followings.
- laptop dials to my desktop pc
- laptop sends some command
- desktop hangs up and dials to local
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Assar Westerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ realpat = grep_malloc(strlen(pattern) + sizeof("^(")
+ + sizeof(")$") + 1);
Why not just use asprintf?
Doesn't matter, thsis code
At the beginning of the file vm_object.c, we have the following comment:
The only items within the object structure which are modified after time
of creation are:
reference count locked by object's lock
pager routine locked by object's lock
But at the end of
I think you'll find, once you get that far, that things are anything
but trivial. I'm certainly open to suggestions, but consider:
vinum -i /dev/something volumename
Where does it insert it? What if the volume has more than one plex,
which it will in the case of a mirror?
OK,
From: Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just wondered if this should be integrated into ptrace(), so
the various debuggers wouldn't have to know about it.
It seems that would be the proper abstraction - hardware that supports
it would "have it" - and the programs that "used it"
On Thursday, 8 July 1999 at 18:52:41 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I think you'll find, once you get that far, that things are anything
but trivial. I'm certainly open to suggestions, but consider:
vinum -i /dev/something volumename
Where does it insert it? What if the volume has
I've been following a local Linux mailing list, and a couple of the
users there have been trying FreeBSD ('cos I'm giving a presentation on
it at a Linux user group meeting next month :-)
One of them has an SB16 with a CD-ROM drive. His attempts at installing
FreeBSD from that CD-ROM have met
Hi,
Running -current...
I'm trying to verify SIGFPE handling and am finding some
interesting issues. In the following test program, a divide
by zero is done and the SIGFPE delivered.
$ ./fp
sig == 8
code== 0
z has the value 1.00
It seems that from machine/trap.h the value of
Tony Finch wrote:
User Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the berkeley db (or any other small db) multi user safe? Are there
locks to maintain coherency of multiple processes access the same database files?
The web pages for Berkeley DB 2 claim that it does (note version 2,
not 1.85 as
Hi
Dose anyone know how long a the kernel is busy with context switching
(beetween two processes) ?
Has anyone tested this yet?
I estimate of about 7 usec duration for that, (on a Pentium 400) but
I think that's to long.
Regards
Thomas
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Large data transfers seem to cause the lockup. I know at least 1 netbsd
person has reported similar problems with these new cards, (kern/7216).
Has anyone seen problems like these? Any ideas?
Hmmm...I've been using them in some machines here and haven't seen any
problems. Strange.
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 19:46:38 -0700 (PDT),
Julian Elischer jul...@whistle.com said:
julian With your scheme the clock needs to be always running at elevated
speed.
julian Possibly you might have a startup routine that turns on the elevated
julian frequency, (basically does an 'aquire_timer0()'
jul...@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) writes:
we already use the gs register for SMP now..
what about the fs register?
I vaguely remember that the different segments could be used to achieve
this (%fs points to user space or something)
You can't extend the address space that way,
yeah I remembered how it all worked after I wrote that..
You'd think they'd eventually get the idea of letting the kernel have it's
own 'cr3' and some TLBs eh?
listenning intel?
On 8 Jul 1999, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote:
jul...@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) writes:
we already use the
jul...@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) writes:
we already use the gs register for SMP now..
what about the fs register?
I vaguely remember that the different segments could be used to achieve
this (%fs points to user space or something)
You can't extend the address space that way,
dil...@apollo.backplane.com (Matthew Dillon) writes:
pair-down the fields in both structures. For example, the vnode structure
contains a lot of temporary clustering fields that could be removed
entirely if clustering operations are done at the time of the actual I/O
rather
patr...@mycenae.ilion.eu.org (Patryk Zadarnowski) writes:
You can't extend the address space that way, segments are all parts of
the single 4GB address space described by the page mapping.
True, but you can reserve a part of the 4GB address space (say 128MB of it)
for partitioning into
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Jamie Howard wrote:
The FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD manpage for grep says this:
Grep understands two different versions of regular expression
syntax: ``basic'' and ``extended.'' In GNU grep, there is
no difference in available functionality using
On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 00:03:10 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
I have done. As far as I can tell, the submitter is saying Yes, the
information I was looking for was in the manual page, but it (specifically,
that the root account doesn't use the default entry) is buried as
a throw away comment at
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 19:46:38 -0700 (PDT),
Julian Elischer jul...@whistle.com said:
julian With your scheme the clock needs to be always running at elevated
speed.
julian Possibly you might have a startup routine that turns on the elevated
hi to all,
i have a freebsd installed with internet connection on
my desktop pc and on my laptop as well. because i am
traveling a lot between two countries, i'd like to
make followings.
- laptop dials to my desktop pc
- laptop sends some command
- desktop hangs up and dials to local isp
-
Geza Fodor wrote:
i have a freebsd installed with internet connection on
my desktop pc and on my laptop as well. because i am
traveling a lot between two countries, i'd like to
make followings.
You should be able to write some scripts which do this; theoretically,
the some commands to
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:54:42 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson d...@nlsystems.com said:
dfr If I understand this correctly, you are suggesting that we program timer0
dfr so that we only take interrupts when a finetimer is due to fire? If so,
dfr then it sounds very good. The idea of taking 6000+
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
Hello!
I am new to FreeBSD and Unix, but not new to programming and TCP/IP.
I have noticed that there is no good clipboard system in FreeBSD. X has
only a rudimentary clipboard, and outside X there is no clipboard that
would be shared between
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:54:42 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson d...@nlsystems.com said:
dfr If I understand this correctly, you are suggesting that we program timer0
dfr so that we only take interrupts when a finetimer is due to fire? If so,
dfr then it
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 11:00:24 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson d...@nlsystems.com said:
There is one problem in this method. acquire_timer0() is only implemented
for i386. We would need to write something equivalent for alpha...
dfr The timer hardware on the alpha is essentially the same but the
You might also want to look a GNUstep ( www.gnustep.org ) as well.
stef
You wrote:
- Whether a similar solution already exists in the freenix world
(perhaps in Linux?)
Might want to look into the various distributed object models being
considered (don't both the KDE and GNOME people have
dfr If I understand this correctly, you are suggesting that we program timer0
dfr so that we only take interrupts when a finetimer is due to fire? If so,
dfr then it sounds very good. The idea of taking 6000+ interrupts/sec made me
dfr uneasy, even though most would return without doing any work.
Hi folks,
Do we still need /etc/skel in the hier(7) manpage and in BSD.root.dist?
It looks to me like an hysterical raisin that should be taken out and
shot.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Somebody should study the abilities of the on-cpu APIC for this
for pentium ff. machines.
In message 199907081527.baa04...@godzilla.zeta.org.au, Bruce Evans writes:
dfr If I understand this correctly, you are suggesting that we program timer0
dfr so that we only take interrupts when a finetimer
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
I have noticed that there is no good clipboard system in FreeBSD. X has only
a rudimentary clipboard, and outside X there is no clipboard that would be
shared between programs... All this while Windows has a very interesting
clipboard system that
:yeah I remembered how it all worked after I wrote that..
:You'd think they'd eventually get the idea of letting the kernel have it's
:own 'cr3' and some TLBs eh?
:
:listenning intel?
This is intel we are talking about. Their mmu/cache technology is
always a few years behind the times.
If someone in the FS dept. would draw up a broad outline for FS implementation
I hereby volunteer to flesh it out thoroughly and donate the end-product docs to
the FreeBSD project. I am a professional UNIX (AIX/SOLARIS) programmer and
fairly clueful kernel source peruser and tweaker, fully
If a system runs out of mbufs can memory be claimed from elsewhere
or is the system pretty much dead especially for networking related
allocations.
jayanth
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
However, we have at least one industrial-type system (with a
different board/config) that works fine with these cards, though we didn't
do the install with one. I'll try that tomorrow and report my findings.
Though the cards seem to work post-install, they fail in the
install
Nope, I did read the docs, hence the patch to the manpage to make
it stand out more clearly. I still am of the opinion that default should
mean default for everyone. AFIK, there are no other fields in passwd
that have different interpretations/defaults depending upon the UID. This
is
However, we have at least one industrial-type system (with a
different board/config) that works fine with these cards, though we didn't
do the install with one. I'll try that tomorrow and report my findings.
Though the cards seem to work post-install, they fail in the
install
program... but if I go into the installer and try to transfer a
distribution , it fails, locking in the same way. I'm talking with Intel
to see if they have had similar problems. I read something in the source
about the reciever has locked after garbage in the syncronization bits...
could
this is problematic.
you cannot add a new element before the pending firing because you can't
tell how far into the present trigger you are.
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 19:46:38 -0700 (PDT),
Julian Elischer
Hi!
I saw your posting on the HU list and was actually able to understand the
Subject: line!
(I guess it wasn't that difficult)
It's fun to se the 'correct translation' so I could compare..
julian
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Geza Fodor wrote:
hi to all,
i have a freebsd installed with internet
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
Sure it is. Some hapless newbie wanders into #FreeBDS on efnet, and asks
an already answered question. Aside from a kick, and a possible ban,
they're
From: Jay Kuri j...@oneway.com
Date: 1999-07-08 11:19:01 -0700
To: David Greenman d...@root.com
Subject: Re: Problem with fxp driver and 82559 cards
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: 199907081808.laa29...@implode.root.com
Delivered-to: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
just collecting URLs for people home pages might be an easier task
perhaps ?
It needs to look better than that. A list of URL's would not look
like a staff page, it would look like a cheesy, uninteresting page of
links. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
just collecting URLs for people home pages might be an easier task
perhaps ?
It needs to look better than that. A list of URL's would not look
like a staff page, it would look like a cheesy, uninteresting page of
links. :)
still it can be a starting point. What success do you expect by
Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
just collecting URLs for people home pages might be an easier task
perhaps ?
It needs to look better than that. A list of URL's would not look
like a staff page, it would look like a cheesy, uninteresting page of
links. :)
besides, we don't all have, or even want to
Hi hackers,
I need your helps, please. I have two IDE drives. They have two
slices for FreeBSD and Windows on each. Last night I tried to install
Windows 95 on the first IDE drive where FreeBSD 3.1.0-Stable has
installed. I executed fdisk program on MS-DOS and created an active
slice to make
Hi,
The following program returns an inconsistant rc/errno value.
Setting a bit corresponding to filedescriptor which is not open
is only found when it is less than 20. ie:
Some example output follows along with the program. This is being
run on a -current system. If I open a file on fd
Sheldon,
On Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 10:23:06AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
I have done. As far as I can tell, the submitter is saying Yes, the
information I was looking for was in the manual page, but it (specifically,
that the root account doesn't use the default entry) is buried as
a
I'm not asking any of you to prepare a resume - we're starting JUST with
the core team bios and pictures here. :)
- Jordan
just collecting URLs for people home pages might be an easier task
perhaps ?
It needs to look better than that. A list of URL's would not look
like a staff
I'm not asking any of you to prepare a resume - we're starting JUST with
the core team bios and pictures here. :)
i knew you were not humans...
cheers
luigi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of
In article
local.mail.freebsd-hackers/199907082010.qaa06...@bb01f39.unx.sas.com you
write:
Hi,
The following program returns an inconsistant rc/errno value.
Setting a bit corresponding to filedescriptor which is not open
is only found when it is less than 20. ie:
This is because initially,
:This is because initially, only 20 descriptors are allocated, and
:the system is quietly ignoring any descriptors over the allocated
:amount:
:
:if (uap-nd p-p_fd-fd_nfiles)
:uap-nd = p-p_fd-fd_nfiles; /* forgiving; slightly wrong */
:
:This should be:
:
:if
On Jul 07, 1999 at 02:33:19PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Not unless you want to blow up virtually every program that uses select!!!
Passing an nd parameter that is greater then the current number of
descriptors is perfectly valid. It's setting a bit in the bitmask for
one
:Hmm, you're right. Arguably, it could return EINVAL. Actually, the
:man page documents this behavior, although it gets the 256 number wrong.
:
: If nfds is greater than the number of open files, select() is not guaran-
: teed to examine the unused file descriptors. For historical
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Hmm, you're right. Arguably, it could return EINVAL. Actually, the
:man page documents this behavior, although it gets the 256 number wrong.
:
: If nfds is greater than the number of open files, select() is not
guaran-
: teed to examine
-hackers,
Tim Singletary has written some man pages for the dbm_* functions in libc,
which are currently undocumented -- we know they are written in terms
of dbopen(), but it's nice to have them documented anyway.
Could anyone who knows anything about DBM take a look at docs/12557 and
let me
I just wondered if this should be integrated into ptrace(), so
the various debuggers wouldn't have to know about it.
It seems that would be the proper abstraction - hardware that supports
it would have it - and the programs that used it wouldn't have to
know anything special.
I only have a
hi to all,
i have a freebsd installed with internet connection on
my desktop pc and on my laptop as well. because i am
traveling a lot between two countries, i'd like to
make followings.
- laptop dials to my desktop pc
- laptop sends some command
- desktop hangs up and dials to local
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Assar Westerlund as...@sics.se writes:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav d...@flood.ping.uio.no writes:
+ realpat = grep_malloc(strlen(pattern) + sizeof(^()
+ + sizeof()$) + 1);
Why not just use asprintf?
Doesn't matter, thsis code is
From: Julian Elischer jul...@whistle.com
Subject: Re: Rewriting pca(4) using finetimer(9) (was: Re: MPU401 now works
under New Midi Driver Framework with a Fine Timer)
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 11:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: pine.bsf.3.95.990708112244.25198c-100...@current1.whistle.com
julian this
At the beginning of the file vm_object.c, we have the following comment:
The only items within the object structure which are modified after time
of creation are:
reference count locked by object's lock
pager routine locked by object's lock
But at the end of
I think you'll find, once you get that far, that things are anything
but trivial. I'm certainly open to suggestions, but consider:
vinum -i /dev/something volumename
Where does it insert it? What if the volume has more than one plex,
which it will in the case of a mirror?
OK,
From: Thomas David Rivers riv...@dignus.com
I just wondered if this should be integrated into ptrace(), so
the various debuggers wouldn't have to know about it.
It seems that would be the proper abstraction - hardware that supports
it would have it - and the programs that used it
On Thursday, 8 July 1999 at 18:52:41 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I think you'll find, once you get that far, that things are anything
but trivial. I'm certainly open to suggestions, but consider:
vinum -i /dev/something volumename
Where does it insert it? What if the volume has
I've been following a local Linux mailing list, and a couple of the
users there have been trying FreeBSD ('cos I'm giving a presentation on
it at a Linux user group meeting next month :-)
One of them has an SB16 with a CD-ROM drive. His attempts at installing
FreeBSD from that CD-ROM have met
Hi,
Running -current...
I'm trying to verify SIGFPE handling and am finding some
interesting issues. In the following test program, a divide
by zero is done and the SIGFPE delivered.
$ ./fp
sig == 8
code== 0
z has the value 1.00
It seems that from machine/trap.h the value of code
Tony Finch wrote:
User Joe j...@monk.via.net wrote:
Is the berkeley db (or any other small db) multi user safe? Are there
locks to maintain coherency of multiple processes access the same database
files?
The web pages for Berkeley DB 2 claim that it does (note version 2,
not 1.85 as
96 matches
Mail list logo