USB doesn't present a 16550A interface to the host, so I don't think
that sio would have a USB attachment.
So there's going to be manufacturer-specific terminal/serial port drivers
to talk to the serial ports on USB-attached laptop docking stations, like
the Annex ethernet
Present in -Stable and -Current. If you go to Configure | Distributions |
src and attempt to choose All, the src distribution never gets selected and
nothing gets installed. I can send a PR if needed, but it's such a small
thing I didn't think it would be worth it.
Doug
To
There used to be security holes that allowed root to lower `securelevel'
using init. Rev.1.9 defends against any undiscovered holes.
How about following change?
OK.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Wemm writes:
: Warner: I've had a look at your pccard_nbk patches, and they seem to work
: for me reasonably well considering what it's trying to do. :-)
:-)
: Please, can we have it committed?
OK. I can do that. Makes it easier on me.
: Leave the #if 0 in
[[ questions trimmed ]]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Reilly" writes:
: And USB? This reference says that you can (now? soon?) buy a
: laptop docking station with all of the usual ports, connected
: only by USB...
:
: http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?99093.piusb.htm
:
:
Hello!
The following program
#include stdio.h
#include fcntl.h
main() {
int control;
if ((control = open("STATUS",O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK))0) {
perror("Could not open STATUS ");
exit(1);
}
printf("STATUS ready\n");
On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 09:00:00PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warren
Welch writes:
Might be a good time have a sys/dev/sio and have pccard, cardbus, pci
and isa attachments there. Yes, I did say cardbus, since I have seen
cardbus PCI modems that are NOT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Reilly writes:
: So there's going to be manufacturer-specific terminal/serial port drivers
: to talk to the serial ports on USB-attached laptop docking stations, like
: the Annex ethernet terminal server things? I guess in the Windows world
: they must provide
On Mon, 06 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
: http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?99093.piusb.htm
:
: Hmm. What sort of level of nesting do we support for this sort
: of thing? It's probably possible to buy USB interface cards
: that plug into ISA, PCI, SCSI? And vice-versa?
Once securelevel has been increased, no process can decrease it because
kernel always refuse decreasing it. This is inconsistent with the
manual page of init:
The kernel runs with four different levels of security. Any super-user
process can raise the security level, but only init
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin Day writes:
: No, I'm working on adding support for PCI based non-winmodems. Modems that
: still have a 16550 based uart interface to them, but just happen to sit on
: the PCI bus. I'm not at all planning on writing support for winmodems,
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There used to be security holes that allowed root to lower `securelevel'
using init. Rev.1.9 defends against any undiscovered holes.
How about following change?
--
*** init.8.ORIG Mon Sep 6 14:20:46 1999
--- init.8 Mon Sep 6 14:23:01 1999
Wilko Bulte wrote...
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
It sounds like there may be a couple of things going on. First, your
scanner may not be returning sense information properly.
Second, the NCR driver may be doing something wrong.
It would be helpful if you could hook this up to
Rene de Vries wrote...
It sounds like there may be a couple of things going on. First, your
scanner may not be returning sense information properly.
Second, the NCR driver may be doing something wrong.
It would be helpful if you could hook this up to your 7890 controller and
see
And USB? This reference says that you can (now? soon?) buy a
laptop docking station with all of the usual ports, connected
only by USB...
http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?99093.piusb.htm
That thing looks very simple probably on the USB bus:
root hub
device
Once securelevel has been increased, no process can decrease it because
kernel always refuse decreasing it. This is inconsistent with the
manual page of init:
The kernel runs with four different levels of security. Any super-user
process can raise the security level, but only init
: The only reason that I see for which we would actually panic() in
:this situation (as opposed to suffer the packet loss) is if we get to the
:point where we're losing packets because some script kid starts up
:something that will eat up sockbuf space and continuously fork, then we
:would
"Alex" == Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex if ((control = open("STATUS",O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK))0) {
Alex fails to run (STATUS is pre-created FIFO file) with error
Alex "Device not configured", which seems kinda odd for me.
Alex However, when FIFO is opened with O_RDWR and
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
I'm actually going to look at doing this tommorow, but I have to admit
the sio driver isn't really going to like doing this. Has anyone
looked at this before and could possibly give any suggestions as to
how
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin Day writes:
: No, I'm working on adding support for PCI based non-winmodems. Modems that
: still have a 16550 based uart interface to them, but just happen to sit on
: the PCI bus. I'm not at all planning on writing
This is under 3.2-STABLE as of a few days ago. Any ideas here?
Yes, use CURRENT :-)
This is the ethernet device, which appears as port 4 of this hub. (1-3 are
USB ports, port 4 is an ethernet port)
That is the way it should be done. I have a PCI card here with a hub
included to make 4
This is under 3.2-STABLE as of a few days ago. Any ideas here?
Yes, use CURRENT :-)
Ok, I'll upgrade tommorow and try again.
ConnectionStatus: DeviceConnected
Current Config Value: 0x01
Device Bus Speed: Full
Device Address: 0x06
Open Pipes: 3
I'll give that a try too. I do like having a USB keyboard, except for the
fact that if the system is *very* busy, I tend to get some weird
repetitions. I dunno if this'll happen under FreeBSD or not, but it's
annoying.
(example, I start up ScanDisk, and a CPU eating program at the
I'll give that a try too. I do like having a USB keyboard, except for the
fact that if the system is *very* busy, I tend to get some weird
repetitions. I dunno if this'll happen under FreeBSD or not, but it's
annoying.
(example, I start up ScanDisk, and a CPU eating program at the same
"Bruce" == Bruce Evans writes:
Description:
Attempt to open FIFO file with O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK results in
Device not configured error.
Bruce This is because there is no reader when the FIFO is opened for
Bruce writing (O_WRONLY opens of FIFOs normally block waiting for a
Bruce reader, but
KATO Takenori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The kernel runs with four different levels of security.
! Any super-user process can raise the security level, but no process
can lower it.
How about "The security level can only be raised by the super-user,
and cannot be lowered by anyone."
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Robert Kuan wrote:
Hi,
I have a few questions on FreeBSD installation; I hope you would help me to
answer them.
1. How to change the labels and modify the FreeBSD Booteasy. I.e.,
From: F1 ??
F2 DOS
F3 DOS
F4 FreeBSD
Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"The Wrath of Satoshi" (free interpretation of "The Wrath of Khan")
8-)
The question is, does "The Wrath of Satoshi" also have Kirstie Alley
in the role of Lt. Saavik? And if it doesn't, what else does it have
that makes it worth watching?
Too bad she's a
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 05:39:01PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
How does one enable dumps before init?
Warner
According to the dumpon(8) manpage:
The dump device can also be specified at kernel compile time using the
``dumps on'' clause in the kernel configuration file (see config(8)).
This
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 05:39:01PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
How does one enable dumps before init?
Warner
According to the dumpon(8) manpage:
The dump device can also be specified at kernel compile time using the
``dumps on'' clause in
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 02:36:38PM +0200, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 05:39:01PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
How does one enable dumps before init?
Warner
According to the dumpon(8) manpage:
The dump device can
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
The following program
#include stdio.h
#include fcntl.h
main() {
int control;
if ((control = open("STATUS",O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK))0) {
perror("Could not open STATUS ");
exit(1);
}
:
:KATO Takenori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The kernel runs with four different levels of security.
: ! Any super-user process can raise the security level, but no process
: can lower it.
:
:How about "The security level can only be raised by the super-user,
:and cannot be lowered by
Is there a way to get FreeBSD 2.2.8 to ask you for the root device
rather than have it attempt to mount and fail ?
Darren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Darren Reed wrote:
Is there a way to get FreeBSD 2.2.8 to ask you for the root device
rather than have it attempt to mount and fail ?
The 3.x branch is a lot smarter about this, but I agree that it would be
nice in those situations where it still can't find it to stop and ask
rather
Both postmaster and mailer-daemon seem to have some amount of historical
precedent.
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes:
: If we do this, I hope a more obvious name is chosen; something like
: "mailman" might be a start. Or "mailperson",
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Matthew N.
Dodd" writes:
: The real problem is the 'isa_get_foo()' calls that are used. I've got a
: small start of splitting out the ISA bits from the probe/attach routines
: but I'm really not sure what the best way to
According to Jan Pechanec:
another one mentioned and shipped with FreeBSD, it enables custom
strings (OS-BS ?).
OS-BS 2.0b8, found in the tools directory on FTP/CD. Don't be fooled by the
beta part, there never was any non-beta of 2.0. Works fine, including booting
from other disks.
--
Matthew Dillon writes:
Though, as a side note, it should be noted that if you have DDB
enabled then lowering the secure level is pretty easy to do. If you
have access to the console, of course.
It should also be noted that it makes no sense to enable DDB on
systems that need to
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Doug wrote:
...
can find the files at http://gorean.org/rcfiles/
looks good so far.
I'm missing rc.serial in rcfiles.
While you are at it, could you please change rc.serial to be consistent with the
other rc* files?
rc.serial should only implement the functions and import
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Ugen Antsilevitch wrote:
Hey!
Thanx a lot first of all!
Anytime i CAN write something myself - i do. I can go as low as networking code
or pseudodevice driver. But i am at loss when it comes to hardware (and within
my scope of work etc. i doubt i will ever learn
:On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 08:39:54AM -0700, a little birdie told me
:that Matthew Dillon remarked
:
: Though, as a side note, it should be noted that if you have DDB
: enabled then lowering the secure level is pretty easy to do. If you
: have access to the console, of course. We
Hey!
Thanx a lot first of all!
Anytime i CAN write something myself - i do. I can go as low as networking code
or pseudodevice driver. But i am at loss when it comes to hardware (and within
my scope of work etc. i doubt i will ever learn this stuff). Thats why i pleaded
for
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
Wilko Bulte wrote...
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
...
Even if we assume the scanner yelled for attention and/or the ncr
driver is at fault I don't really understand why the cam layer
decides to panic the machine. Wouldn't it be sufficient to return
EIO,
I volonteer to be your first alpha-tester. I have this modem
blaster thing. It is PCI and it has a UART. I was going to sell it
and shell out lots of money for USRobotics 56K ISA real modem. BTW
they call it "legacy" modem - i think the general direction is such
that PCI will be
As Brian F. Feldman wrote ...
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
Mike Smith:
| Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEASE
|
|You could try to backport the two sets of commits I just made to the
|-stable branch, but you might be better off moving
Is it time to install src/etc/rc.sysctl now ? I certainly think it's
a good idea :-]
--
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Awfulhak.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 07:15:00PM -0400, Ugen Antsilevitch wrote:
Supporting winmodems
btw would be nice, although i doubt manufacturers will give us their code.
That might not be necessary, eventually. I've heard, obliquely,
of a project to develop "open source" modem (data pump) software
Andrew Reilly writes:
Does anyone know whether there's more to a "WinModem" than a
line hybrid, a codec and a PCI interface?
"It Depends". For many of them, yes, that's pretty much all there is.
However Motorola (at least) has a reference design for a "WinModem"
that uses their DSP56303
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 07:15:00PM -0400, Ugen Antsilevitch wrote:
Supporting winmodems
btw would be nice, although i doubt manufacturers will give us their code.
That might not be necessary, eventually. I've heard, obliquely,
of a project to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Somers writes:
: Is it time to install src/etc/rc.sysctl now ? I certainly think it's
: a good idea :-]
No. I don't think we want to install rc.sysctl for an installworld.
It would spam changes that others make to them.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
: Though, as a side note, it should be noted that if you have DDB
: enabled then lowering the secure level is pretty easy to do. If you
: have access to the console, of course.
:
:It should also be noted that it makes no sense to enable DDB on
:systems that need to use elevated
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree quite strongly. DDB provides a mechanism to allow a
sysadmin to obtain a greater amount of information from a panic
situation then he could get otherwise. Being able to obtain this
information does not run counter to running
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the system winds up in a state where a kernel core cannot be
generated, DDB is the only way to figure out what is going on.
securelevel is a mechanism which attempts to guarentee data security,
at least to a degree.
The problem is that DDB
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 07:15:00PM -0400, Ugen Antsilevitch wrote:
Supporting winmodems
btw would be nice, although i doubt manufacturers will give us their code.
That might not be necessary, eventually. I've heard, obliquely,
of a project to develop "open source" modem (data pump)
I have only recently begun to use FreeBSD but I consider myself
competent with Linux and I have had FreeBSD installed on my PC for
over a week now and I decided to build a kernel for my machine and get
rid of all the unnecessary drivers and whatnot (like everything SCSI,
the Qcam
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Nick Hibma wrote:
Anyway, as soon as you can physically access the PC, youD loose anyway,
independent of whether you can go into DDB to do things. You can reboot,
boot a floppy. Yes you can do something about those things, but only to
a limited extent.
Not without
Warner Losh wrote:
In message 199909051942.oaa42...@celery.dragondata.com Kevin Day writes:
: No, I'm working on adding support for PCI based non-winmodems. Modems that
: still have a 16550 based uart interface to them, but just happen to sit on
: the PCI bus. I'm not at all planning on
In message 19990906060506.39c691...@overcee.netplex.com.au Peter Wemm writes:
: Warner: I've had a look at your pccard_nbk patches, and they seem to work
: for me reasonably well considering what it's trying to do. :-)
:-)
: Please, can we have it committed?
OK. I can do that. Makes it easier
Present in -Stable and -Current. If you go to Configure | Distributions
|
src and attempt to choose All, the src distribution never gets selected and
nothing gets installed. I can send a PR if needed, but it's such a small
thing I didn't think it would be worth it.
Doug
To
The long-awaited moment (well, by me anyway) has arrived. Except for the
files in /etc/periodic I have finished the cleanup of the /bin/sh scripts
in /etc. I've followed the style guidelines requested by the majority of
-hackers, so I hope that I've made everyone as happy as possible here.
USB doesn't present a 16550A interface to the host, so I don't think
that sio would have a USB attachment.
So there's going to be manufacturer-specific terminal/serial port drivers
to talk to the serial ports on USB-attached laptop docking stations, like
the Annex ethernet
No. The Windows world presents a standard SERIAL DRIVER interface, at
least that's the theory that is preached. I see no reason why a USB
serial port wouldn't do the same. USB defines a serial port
interface, IIRC, which is the same across manufacturers (in theory)
which would be
And USB? This reference says that you can (now? soon?) buy a
laptop docking station with all of the usual ports, connected
only by USB...
http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?99093.piusb.htm
That thing looks very simple probably on the USB bus:
root hub
device
Alex == Alex Povolotsky tark...@asteroid.svib.ru writes:
Alex if ((control = open(STATUS,O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK))0) {
Alex fails to run (STATUS is pre-created FIFO file) with error
Alex Device not configured, which seems kinda odd for me.
Alex However, when FIFO is opened with O_RDWR and
You don't want to know what a ethernet/parallel/serial/hub thingie looks
like. I don't have one, so anyone that has one, could you send me the
output of the usb_dump utility avaible from
http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/usb/usb.pl
I had a problem when I tried plugging in my two usb
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
I'm actually going to look at doing this tommorow, but I have to admit
the sio driver isn't really going to like doing this. Has anyone
looked at this before and could possibly give any suggestions as to
how
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message 199909051942.oaa42...@celery.dragondata.com Kevin Day writes:
: No, I'm working on adding support for PCI based non-winmodems. Modems that
: still have a 16550 based uart interface to them, but just happen to sit on
: the PCI bus. I'm not at
This is under 3.2-STABLE as of a few days ago. Any ideas here?
Yes, use CURRENT :-)
This is the ethernet device, which appears as port 4 of this hub. (1-3 are
USB ports, port 4 is an ethernet port)
That is the way it should be done. I have a PCI card here with a hub
included to make 4 out
This is under 3.2-STABLE as of a few days ago. Any ideas here?
Yes, use CURRENT :-)
Ok, I'll upgrade tommorow and try again.
ConnectionStatus: DeviceConnected
Current Config Value: 0x01
Device Bus Speed: Full
Device Address: 0x06
Open Pipes: 3
I'll give that a try too. I do like having a USB keyboard, except for the
fact that if the system is *very* busy, I tend to get some weird
repetitions. I dunno if this'll happen under FreeBSD or not, but it's
annoying.
(example, I start up ScanDisk, and a CPU eating program at the
I'll give that a try too. I do like having a USB keyboard, except for the
fact that if the system is *very* busy, I tend to get some weird
repetitions. I dunno if this'll happen under FreeBSD or not, but it's
annoying.
(example, I start up ScanDisk, and a CPU eating program at the same
Bruce == Bruce Evans writes:
Description:
Attempt to open FIFO file with O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK results in
Device not configured error.
Bruce This is because there is no reader when the FIFO is opened for
Bruce writing (O_WRONLY opens of FIFOs normally block waiting for a
Bruce reader, but
KATO Takenori k...@ganko.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp writes:
The kernel runs with four different levels of security.
! Any super-user process can raise the security level, but no process
can lower it.
How about The security level can only be raised by the super-user,
and cannot be lowered by
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Robert Kuan wrote:
Hi,
I have a few questions on FreeBSD installation; I hope you would help me to
answer them.
1. How to change the labels and modify the FreeBSD Booteasy. I.e.,
From: F1 ??
F2 DOS
F3 DOS
F4 FreeBSD
Wilko Bulte wi...@yedi.iaf.nl writes:
The Wrath of Satoshi (free interpretation of The Wrath of Khan)
8-)
The question is, does The Wrath of Satoshi also have Kirstie Alley
in the role of Lt. Saavik? And if it doesn't, what else does it have
that makes it worth watching?
Too bad she's a
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 05:39:01PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
How does one enable dumps before init?
Warner
According to the dumpon(8) manpage:
The dump device can also be specified at kernel compile time using the
``dumps on'' clause in the kernel configuration file (see config(8)).
This is
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 05:39:01PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
How does one enable dumps before init?
Warner
According to the dumpon(8) manpage:
The dump device can also be specified at kernel compile time using the
``dumps on'' clause in
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 02:36:38PM +0200, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 05:39:01PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
How does one enable dumps before init?
Warner
According to the dumpon(8) manpage:
The dump device can
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
SIO doesn't support anything but isa attachments right now. Its probe
and attach routines need to be corrected to not be ISA specific.
I think I will tackle that soon.
You'd be my (and a lot of other people's) hero.
--
- bill fumerola -
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
The following program
#include stdio.h
#include fcntl.h
main() {
int control;
if ((control = open(STATUS,O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK))0) {
perror(Could not open STATUS );
exit(1);
}
:
:KATO Takenori k...@ganko.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp writes:
: The kernel runs with four different levels of security.
: ! Any super-user process can raise the security level, but no process
: can lower it.
:
:How about The security level can only be raised by the super-user,
:and cannot be lowered
Is there a way to get FreeBSD 2.2.8 to ask you for the root device
rather than have it attempt to mount and fail ?
Darren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Darren Reed wrote:
Is there a way to get FreeBSD 2.2.8 to ask you for the root device
rather than have it attempt to mount and fail ?
The 3.x branch is a lot smarter about this, but I agree that it would be
nice in those situations where it still can't find it to stop and ask
rather
Both postmaster and mailer-daemon seem to have some amount of historical
precedent.
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message 199909012256.paa01...@dingo.cdrom.com Mike Smith writes:
: If we do this, I hope a more obvious name is chosen; something like
: mailman might be a start.
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 08:39:54AM -0700, a little birdie told me
that Matthew Dillon remarked
Though, as a side note, it should be noted that if you have DDB
enabled then lowering the secure level is pretty easy to do. If you
have access to the console, of course. We used this
On Fri, 03 Sep 1999 16:23:00 -0600
Wes Peters w...@softweyr.com wrote:
See, for instance, the al, ax, mx, pn, vr, and wb drivers. ;^)
^^
Especially this one.. it's not a Tulip clone :-)
Oh? vr(4) disagrees:
:On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 08:39:54AM -0700, a little birdie told me
:that Matthew Dillon remarked
:
: Though, as a side note, it should be noted that if you have DDB
: enabled then lowering the secure level is pretty easy to do. If you
: have access to the console, of course. We used
At the risk of being flamed for my inexperience...
I caught the thread here more or less because it was a conspicuous mess on my
list (and thanks to the flamers with the name suggestions, even longer). I still
think that something good could be done here that of course would cause a little
work,
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message pine.bsf.4.10.9909052055080.14497-100...@sasami.jurai.net
Matthew N. Dodd writes:
: The real problem is the 'isa_get_foo()' calls that are used. I've got a
: small start of splitting out the ISA bits from the probe/attach routines
: but I'm
According to Jan Pechanec:
another one mentioned and shipped with FreeBSD, it enables custom
strings (OS-BS ?).
OS-BS 2.0b8, found in the tools directory on FTP/CD. Don't be fooled by the
beta part, there never was any non-beta of 2.0. Works fine, including booting
from other disks.
--
Matthew Dillon writes:
Though, as a side note, it should be noted that if you have DDB
enabled then lowering the secure level is pretty easy to do. If you
have access to the console, of course.
It should also be noted that it makes no sense to enable DDB on
systems that need to
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Doug wrote:
...
can find the files at http://gorean.org/rcfiles/
looks good so far.
I'm missing rc.serial in rcfiles.
While you are at it, could you please change rc.serial to be consistent with the
other rc* files?
rc.serial should only implement the functions and import
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Ugen Antsilevitch wrote:
Hey!
Thanx a lot first of all!
Anytime i CAN write something myself - i do. I can go as low as networking
code
or pseudodevice driver. But i am at loss when it comes to hardware (and within
my scope of work etc. i doubt i will ever learn
Hey!
Thanx a lot first of all!
Anytime i CAN write something myself - i do. I can go as low as networking
code
or pseudodevice driver. But i am at loss when it comes to hardware (and
within
my scope of work etc. i doubt i will ever learn this stuff). Thats why i
pleaded
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
Wilko Bulte wrote...
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
...
Even if we assume the scanner yelled for attention and/or the ncr
driver is at fault I don't really understand why the cam layer
decides to panic the machine. Wouldn't it be sufficient to return
EIO,
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
I think you're panicking prematurely, Ugen. You're also checking the
very bottom of the market, and you're exaggerating (in your comment
about shelling out lot's of cash for a conventional modem) the cost of
a regular modem. Things just aren't that
Well, he's partially true.
We're looking at mass buying several thousand PCI modems. The cost for a
non-winmodem model is about 3x the Winmodem style. (You can buy winmodems
very cheap, since everyone is making them now. You can't buy non-winmodem's
cheap because only a few are doing
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
This is pretty much untrue, because not all applications (industrial
applications) for modems have a PC to talk to, so it's totally
impossible for conventional modems to go away. I used to make my living
tending large banks of modems, and not all
Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Doug wrote:
...
can find the files at http://gorean.org/rcfiles/
looks good so far.
I'm missing rc.serial in rcfiles.
Thanks for the reminder. I didn't make any changes to that file because
there weren't any [/test lines in it,
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
