Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
| While it is certainly true that a person could eventually get
physical
| access into the machine, it is a significantly more difficult
task and
| therefore a significant distinction still exists between the
data stored
| on the hard drive and
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
: test3:/root# newfs -i 262144 -f 8192 -b 65536 /dev/rvn1c
: /dev/rvn1c: 83886080 sectors in 2560 cylinders of 1 tracks, 32768 sectors
: 40960.0MB in 160 cyl groups (16 c/g, 256.00MB/g, 1024 i/g)
Running bonnie on the filesystem with
As most of you are probably aware, the freebsd-arch mailing list is
no longer a moderated list, as we know it. For now, it acts like a
non-moderated list, except that some threads may be locked out of
the list if they stray off topic.
Some people tried starting two different threads in that
Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Randall writes:
Under what conditions does bind(2) set errno to EAGAIN? The 3.2R bind(2)
manual page does not list that as a valid value for errno when bind
returns -1.
Please file a PR so this gets fixed.
- -Archie
I went ahead a
Please note that freebsd-arch was created to provide a place for
amicable high-level technical discussion. Anyone straying from the
list charter will be removed.
Anyone straying from the list charter will be removed.
Discuss technical matters. Dont argue or state catagorically that
"this
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:40:04PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
And the same I ask of you, hackers-subscribed non-committers.
Just to clarify, -arch is supposed to be used when discussing
changes to FreeBSD itself. Things that might (or might not,
depending on how the discussion goes)
my problem with 'subscribers-only' posting policy is that people have
more than one email address that they use. which one is teh honored
one?
if non-subscribers are a problem, i have ways of dealing with them. ;P
shamelessplugStopping Spam talk at FreeBSDcon/plug/shameless
jmb
To
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 08:33:12AM -0700, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
my problem with 'subscribers-only' posting policy is that people have
more than one email address that they use. which one is teh honored
one?
Erp, a very fair point.
if non-subscribers are a problem, i have ways of
Hello all,
it's my first time, so please be gentle...
I'm not sure if this is the right list for this issue
(freebsd-install looks better, but is closed, at least according to the
charter), so please redirect me if necessary.
I was recently annoyed to find that I cannot
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Darryl Okahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's the problem. While I agree with you about persistent,
annoying, and utterly clueless newbies, I don't agree with the apparent
sentiment (with which you may or may not agree) where all newbies (and
not just
:On 6 Oct, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
: | I would rather brand the filesystem with the ID of the host. The
: | starting situation is an "unmarked" filesystem. If a host detects the
: | mounting of an "unmarked" filesystem, it will brand it with it's ID. If
: | it detects a filesystem that has an
The main router is the freebsd box. Broadcasts can go out of the router to
the DSL customers, but they cant go from one customer to another because
each is a distinct bridge group.
Dennis
At 07:19 PM 10/6/99 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I still don't fully understand where, in the picture below,
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Josef Karthauser wrote:
cdidDisplay the serial number of the cd using the method
used by the cddb (http://www.cddb.org) project.
pedantic
URLs end with a trailing slash. (http://www.cddb.org/)
/pedantic
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Matthew Dillon wrote
Revisiting security now...
A provision for public-key encryption of the data held on the disk (as
well as the id itself) would be useful. Just encrypting the ID alone
would not be useful.
The distinction would then shift away from whether the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oliver Fromme writes:
: Beware, I have not actually tried this with FreeBSD, and there
: might be bugs that prevent using 2.88 Mb floppies.
The BIOS will report a different value for the 2.88MB drives to the
probe routines... You may need to do some touchup there as
Hi there,
I got my hands on an old Turbochannel Alpha machine. I'm currently
in the process of attempting to install 3.3-Rel on it.
Unfortunately it does not detect any disks:
Entering kernel at 0xfc320fc0...
Copyright (c) 1992-1999 FreeBSD Inc.
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991,
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 02:02:48PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Josef Karthauser wrote:
cdidDisplay the serial number of the cd using the method
used by the cddb (http://www.cddb.org) project.
pedantic
URLs end with a trailing slash.
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:Running bonnie on the filesystem with these parameters results in
:unkillable process sitting in getblk (it's the first phase of bonnie test
:when they use putc() to create the file). It just sits there and doesn't
:consume CPU. The OS is
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
# A single entry for any of these controllers (ncr, ahb, ahc, amd) is
# sufficient for any number of installed devices.
controller ncr0
controller isp0
#controller esp0
in GENERIC. I mean, esp is the driver for the 53C94 ncr scsi
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:40:04PM +0900, a little birdie told me
that Daniel C. Sobral remarked
Some people tried starting two different threads in that list. We
failed in both cases. Though we don't know yet, I suspect it is
simply a case of lack of subscribers.
Hmmm...
I WAS subscribed,
Wilko Bulte wrote...
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
Wilko Bulte wrote...
I have the distinct (bad) feeling this is due to:
# A single entry for any of these controllers (ncr, ahb, ahc, amd) is
# sufficient for any number of installed devices.
controller ncr0
controller
Matthew N. Dodd wrote...
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
# A single entry for any of these controllers (ncr, ahb, ahc, amd) is
# sufficient for any number of installed devices.
controller ncr0
controller isp0
#controller esp0
in GENERIC. I mean, esp is the
I'm running it right now on a 3.3-STABLE machien with a 166Mhz CPU (there
are two inthe machine, but FreeBSD won't allow me to bring up the second
oen *sigh*)...the machine has 512MB of RAM and ~24Gig of Disk space...
The server is configured to use 128MB of RAM, and top is currently
| Please, don't give me this crap. "Removable media" is a very
| well-defined terminology.
Only in screw-your-device-into-the-machine land.
We're have to consider hot-swappable devices, including hard disks
and floppies and video cameras and new-uber-whatzit-media.
The admin has
[.]
As I pointed out, the distinction is one of intent on the part of
the admin.
Absolutely.
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
[.]
--
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Awfulhak.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's a passing thought I had which may be relevant.
Make uids randomly assigned. This solves the problem of collision between
uids on an introduced medium and the ones on the local system by making it
statistical (if the uid space is large enough). In order to manage this
among multiple
:
: Try using a smaller block size, like 16K. If that doesn't work then just
: stick with 8K I guess. The kernel's clustering code should still make it
: reasonably efficient.
:
:Yeah, I guess that's the only way to do it on 3.x... But how can I speed
:up fsck then, since newfs
Warner Losh wrote...
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wilko Bulte writes:
: How difficult would CAMifying a driver be?
Speaking of which, has a "How to CAMify a driver" doc been written?
Nope. You've CAMified a driver, would you like to write it? :)
Ken
--
Kenneth Merry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're running 3.3-REL on dual processor PII-450's, with a N440BX
motherboard, using the onboard EtherExpress Pro (fxp) NIC and 512MB RAM.
These machines are running custom software that excercises the disk, CPU
and network quite heavily. The SMP machines seem to have both "fxp0:
device timeout"
Greetings,
We're running 3.3-REL on dual processor PII-450's, with a N440BX
motherboard, using the onboard EtherExpress Pro (fxp) NIC and 512MB RAM.
These machines are running custom software that excercises the disk, CPU
and network quite heavily. The SMP machines seem to have both
Greetings,
We're running 3.3-REL on dual processor PII-450's, with a N440BX
motherboard, using the onboard EtherExpress Pro (fxp) NIC and 512MB RAM.
These machines are running custom software that excercises the disk, CPU
and network quite heavily. The SMP machines seem to have both "fxp0:
We run about 50 machines with a similar setup (asus p2bd mb) all of which
run quite well. We have NMBCLUSERS=30720 though...
- Todd
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Stevan Arychuk wrote:
Greetings,
We're running 3.3-REL on dual processor PII-450's, with a N440BX
motherboard, using the onboard
32 matches
Mail list logo
