Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 12:45 AM -0700 12/21/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> >Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > > [...] but I was wondering how much one has to fork out before you
> > > get extra options like a port-mirroring capability...
> >
> >Lots more, in terms of dollars. For this, you need at
Is there someone closer to a linux box, tell me if sk_buff is more
fast than mbuf. I was reading these codes but I can't figure out the final
result.
===
visi0n
AUX Technologies
[www.aux-tech.org]
To Unsubscri
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 05:38:35PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Hmm, last time I checked, they were just 'serial ports'.
>
> Nope. The significance is determined by the software, and you're stuck
> with the fact that the first serial port is the console port. End of
> story. (Note: if
i was told by a freebsd friend to ask you this question:
can *bsd do kernel-space ip port forwarding?
thanks.
-E
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> > "Swapping them internally" would probably involve about 30 seconds of
> > work. It's not hard, really. 8)
>
> Yes I know I could have done that. Then reconfigured my getty's, my
> minicom etc. It's the principle of the thing - I prefer to bend the
> software to my will rather than have to o
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> "Swapping them internally" would probably involve about 30 seconds of
> work. It's not hard, really. 8)
Yes I know I could have done that. Then reconfigured my getty's, my
minicom etc. It's the principle of the thing - I prefer to bend the
software to
we were usug both IHCI and UHCI which is why we didn't mention it.
we DID have a problem one one of them (which seemed unrelated)
but I can't remember which. It was reported by other people around the
same time so we didn't connect it with our driver.
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Bill Paul wrote:
> Pre
> I've recently had .. ahem .. fun trying to get my headless FreeBSD box to
> spit messages at the console. I've got the kernel doing it right, but not
> the boot loaders. The boot loader will print to the serial device - but it
> won't load my kernel :-( I haven't exhausted all oppurtunities here
Bill Paul writes:
| Previously I mentioned that I was having trouble sending full sized
| ethernet frames (1500 bytes) over USB using my ADMtek AN986 Pegasus
| eval board. The problem turned out to be in the uhci driver, however
| I'm not certain exactly how to incorporate my fix.
|
| The problem
At 12:45 AM -0700 12/21/99, Wes Peters wrote:
>Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > [...] but I was wondering how much one has to fork out before you
> > get extra options like a port-mirroring capability...
>
>Lots more, in terms of dollars. For this, you need at least a managed
>switch, and probably a
Previously I mentioned that I was having trouble sending full sized
ethernet frames (1500 bytes) over USB using my ADMtek AN986 Pegasus
eval board. The problem turned out to be in the uhci driver, however
I'm not certain exactly how to incorporate my fix.
The problem I was seeing was that large f
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Justin Hawkins wrote:
> >
> > I understand it's not really a bug and perhaps is not worth the code
> > effort. A note in the handbook might not go astray - I am sure a lot of
> > people who need a COM2 console will have modem on COM1.
>
> A note o
Justin Hawkins wrote:
>
> I understand it's not really a bug and perhaps is not worth the code
> effort. A note in the handbook might not go astray - I am sure a lot of
> people who need a COM2 console will have modem on COM1.
A note on the handbook and/or man pages can certainly be done. I'd be
On Dec 12, 1999 at 03:55:18PM -0800, Jason Nordwick wrote:
>
> >In article
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> you write:
> >>In my case, load is reasonably distributed. Is poll() really that much
> >>better than select()? I thought that, excepting bit flag manipulations,
> >>it worked basically the same wa
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> I'd say this is an expected result, not a known problem. It is doing
> exactly what it is being told to (gibberish). Junk in, junk out. :-)
Sure.
> > Is there enough room in there for some code, which checks for this? IE if
> > the first line outp
Justin Hawkins wrote:
>
> I think (I am not positive on this) that if the boot loader talks to a
> modem in command mode with echo on, it gets confused and won't boot any
> further. Is this a known problem?
I'd say this is an expected result, not a known problem. It is doing
exactly what it is b
David -
The man page for the ELF linker says:
ld accepts Linker Command Language files to provide ex-
plicit and total control over the linking process. This
man page does not describe the command language; see the
`ld' entry in `info', or the manual ld: the
> Performance is abysmal (~130Mbit). That's next to figure out
> what's up and what I've done stupidly. Feel free to comment..
I should note, btw, that this is, in fact, better than I could get the
Linux released Intel driver to do, so far all I know it's just the cards I
have.
-mat
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:50:50 -0800 (PST), Matthew Dillon wrote:
> What happens when you specify a 1-tick timeout and the tick interrupt
> occurs a microsecond later? For that matter what happens when you want
> 1.5 ticks worth of timeout? Do you get only 1? What happens is that
>
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
>The authors of bsd.port.mk have. Try this:
Oh, that's great! I've wanted for a long time to have a way of building
ports without being root. Thank you.
--
Ben Rosengart
UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group
StarMedia Network, Inc.
To Unsubscr
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 09:22:04 -0600 (CST), Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> you write:
>>In my case, load is reasonably distributed. Is poll() really that much
>>better than select()? I thought that, excepting bit flag manipulations,
>>it worked basical
> -Original Message-
> From: John Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 3:26 PM
> To: David Quattlebaum
> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers
> Subject: RE: modifying an object file
>
>
>
> On 21-Dec-99 David Quattlebaum wrote:
> > Anyone,
> >
> > I have an object file:
On 21-Dec-99 David Quattlebaum wrote:
> Anyone,
>
> I have an object file: foo.o
>
> In foo.o I have a call to bar().
>
> Now, I want foo.o to actually call yo() instead of bar() and say I don't have
> the source
> for foo.c (so recompiling is out of the question). I want to change the
> objec
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David
Quattlebaum writes:
: Has anyone accomplished this without having to dissect the ELF object, change it
: and reconstruct the pieces?
Change the string table. This is the time honored way of kludging
binaries to do things that the original .o's were never int
Anyone,
I have an object file: foo.o
In foo.o I have a call to bar().
Now, I want foo.o to actually call yo() instead of bar() and say I don't have the
source
for foo.c (so recompiling is out of the question). I want to change the object file
foo.o to call yo() instead of bar().
Has anyone ac
On Dec 12, 1999 at 11:50:20AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> I did coordinate with you- you didn't offer to share any technical
> information with me and seemed to indicate that the driver would have
> trouble being released with source. You also said "I haven't written a
> NetWork driver either".
I did coordinate with you- you didn't offer to share any technical
information with me and seemed to indicate that the driver would have
trouble being released with source. You also said "I haven't written a
NetWork driver either". See correspondence below.
Hey- if your driver is cleaner and bet
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>
>I've copied a first cut of an Intel Pro/1000 Gigabit driver for freebsd to:
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/~mjacob/FreeBSD_Intel_Gige.patch.gz
Um, no offense, but why didn't you coordinate with me earlier
about this? I did tell you that I was working on t
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> -On [19991221 18:25], Nik Clayton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >I'm trying to compile OpenJade 1.3, a C++ application, for the Doc. Proj.
> >The build fails with
>
> Bah, you beat me to it ;)
>
> >LangO
-On [19991221 18:25], Nik Clayton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I'm trying to compile OpenJade 1.3, a C++ application, for the Doc. Proj.
>The build fails with
Bah, you beat me to it ;)
>LangObj.cxx:15: wchar.h: No such file or directory
>LangObj.cxx:16: wctype.h: No such file or
I've copied a first cut of an Intel Pro/1000 Gigabit driver for freebsd to:
http://www.freebsd.org/~mjacob/FreeBSD_Intel_Gige.patch.gz
This is a patch against -current's /usr/src/sys as of today. I have run
it on a 2xPPro Intel 440FX and a Alpha PC164 (432Mhz).
This is a very first cut, but se
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:46:37PM -0600, Tim Tsai wrote:
> >
> > Best bang for the buck category: HP ProCurve 4000M. 40 switched 10/100
> > ports (that's with the chassis half filled).
>
> Note that HP's pricing on additional cards is silly.
Nathan Gould wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to contribute, if I may. Is there anything that high on the
> wishlist that I may help with?
>
> A bit of background: I've been with FreeBSD since 2.1. previously
> NeXTSTEP, SCO (don't laugh), HP-UX and SUNOS/Solaris.
>
> One thing I though about is
Folks,
I'm trying to compile OpenJade 1.3, a C++ application, for the Doc. Proj.
The build fails with
LangObj.cxx:15: wchar.h: No such file or directory
LangObj.cxx:16: wctype.h: No such file or directory
gmake[2]: *** [LangObj.lo] Error 1
which is obvious enough. A hunt through /usr/include,
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:46:37PM -0600, Tim Tsai wrote:
>
> Best bang for the buck category: HP ProCurve 4000M. 40 switched 10/100
> ports (that's with the chassis half filled).
Note that HP's pricing on additional cards is silly. It's cheaper
to buy 2 4000Ms and throw the second chassi
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>In my case, load is reasonably distributed. Is poll() really that much
>better than select()? I thought that, excepting bit flag manipulations,
>it worked basically the same way on the kernel end.
Yes, it is better. Select uses the same backend as po
Hi,
I'd like to contribute, if I may. Is there anything that high on the
wishlist that I may help with?
A bit of background: I've been with FreeBSD since 2.1. previously
NeXTSTEP, SCO (don't laugh), HP-UX and SUNOS/Solaris.
One thing I though about is the lack of an LVM equivalent - most
com
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >
> > At 11:18 PM -0700 12/18/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> > >Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > > > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > > > get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal wit
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Tim Tsai wrote:
> > hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> > reset by power-cycling).
>
> Most of these can be attributed to the crappy wall wart they call a
> power supply. If it's plugged into an UPS or replace it with your own DC
> power supply
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 11:18 PM -0700 12/18/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> >Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > > get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal with packet loss
> > > when running saturation tests
40 matches
Mail list logo
